Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Groom marrying 14 year old girl to protect her

  1. #1
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,504
    Thanks
    1,879
    Thanked 1,590 Times in 726 Posts
    Rep Power
    767
    Reputation
    27988

    Default Groom marrying 14 year old girl to protect her

    Another one, and a particularly stupid one at that.



    And he was charged only with going through with the marriage ceremony with an underage person. Charges of having sex with her were dropped. I'm sure he will find someone who wants to protect him in prison if he is even sentenced to it, but I doubt his protector will want to marry him.

    Just total lack of respect for our culture and our laws. He shouldn't be going back to immigration detention. He should be going straight from prison to the airport. This isn't a case of looking at child porn. It isn't a case of talking over the phone about underage sex. He married and ####ed a 14 year old girl, even after a specific warning that it was illegal.

    Also, where were the child protection authorities? Why weren't the police waiting to arrest him on completion of the ceremony?
    Last edited by DB44; 20-09-17 at 04:52 PM.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to DB44 For This Useful Post:

    eaglem (21-09-17),Keith (23-09-17),OSIRUS (20-09-17),Tiny (20-09-17),VroomVroom (20-09-17)



Look Here ->
  • #2
    Senior Member
    Mr 672A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    The only Country in the English speaking World where you cannot sue your Solicitor or Barrister.
    Posts
    4,271
    Thanks
    1,167
    Thanked 1,173 Times in 677 Posts
    Rep Power
    722
    Reputation
    21825

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DB44 View Post

    Also, where were the child protection authorities? Why weren't the police waiting to arrest him on completion of the ceremony?
    Why? They know that some of the Muslims are radical and might give the Police a Jihad against the police. We are not like them where police dominate us but have to think about arresting some Muslims because of the possible repercussions.

  • #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    292
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 111 Times in 67 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    506

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DB44 View Post
    He shouldn't be going back to immigration detention. He should be going straight from prison to the airport.
    He is a Rohingya so is a stateless person - unfortunately there is no where to send him back too. To send people back there needs to be a country that will accept him. So until that happens if not in gaol then it is immigration detention.

  • #4
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,504
    Thanks
    1,879
    Thanked 1,590 Times in 726 Posts
    Rep Power
    767
    Reputation
    27988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    He is a Rohingya so is a stateless person - unfortunately there is no where to send him back too. To send people back there needs to be a country that will accept him. So until that happens if not in gaol then it is immigration detention.
    Bullshit! Send him back to Myanmar. Even if he needs our protection, he has forfeited any claim to it. Perhaps some of his charitable brethren in the Middle East will take him. He might even like it there. He can marry and #### even younger girls. I understand 6 is okay for marriage and 9 for consummation.
    Last edited by DB44; 21-09-17 at 12:22 PM.

  • #5
    Administrator
    mtv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    19,893
    Thanks
    7,508
    Thanked 15,066 Times in 6,761 Posts
    Rep Power
    5647
    Reputation
    239305

    Default

    Well, he was only given a 12 month sentence, which he has served almost that much in custody, so he's due for release in a couple of weeks, but will then go back into immigration detention.

    He was only in Australia on a bridging visa, so I see no issue with deporting him.

    He was fully aware of Australian law re marriage to minors, but he chose to ignore it.

    He should be prosecuted for rape as well IMHO.

    The girl's mother also needs to be charged, convicted, sentenced and deported (if not an Australian citizen).


  • The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mtv For This Useful Post:

    DB44 (21-09-17),eaglem (22-09-17)

  • #6
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,504
    Thanks
    1,879
    Thanked 1,590 Times in 726 Posts
    Rep Power
    767
    Reputation
    27988

    Default

    When a guest pisses in your house .....

  • The Following User Says Thank You to DB44 For This Useful Post:

    eaglem (22-09-17)

  • #7
    Administrator
    admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Age
    56
    Posts
    31,150
    Thanks
    2,238
    Thanked 13,731 Times in 5,823 Posts
    Rep Power
    4552
    Reputation
    165805

    Default

    I'm with DB44 and mtv on this one.

    He deliberately chose to break the law after being advised not to do it and lied on his statement. How child sex charges were not substantiated is beyond me.

    garrycol is correct in that it is a tricky one given his ethnicity, but having said that, why should we have him ? Send him back.

  • The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to admin For This Useful Post:

    eaglem (22-09-17),enf (22-09-17)

  • #8
    Senior Member
    Mr 672A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    The only Country in the English speaking World where you cannot sue your Solicitor or Barrister.
    Posts
    4,271
    Thanks
    1,167
    Thanked 1,173 Times in 677 Posts
    Rep Power
    722
    Reputation
    21825

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mtv View Post
    Well, he was only given a 12 month sentence, which he has served almost that much in custody, so he's due for release in a couple of weeks, but will then go back into immigration detention.
    He will come back but this time with a BOMB. These people should not be in the country to start with (Go Pauline). People don't understand them as if some of them you piss them off they will retaliate back there are not like us that the Police/Government/ A government department dictate us and put us down we just cop it and that it but rub the wrong Muslim up the wrong way they will get there revenge back. This will happen one day and watch the authority here put blame on each other.

  • #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    292
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 111 Times in 67 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    506

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DB44 View Post
    Bullshit! Send him back to Myanmar. Even if he needs our protection, he has forfeited any claim to it. Perhaps some of his charitable brethren in the Middle East will take him. He might even like it there. He can marry and #### even younger girls. I understand 6 is okay for marriage and 9 for consummation.
    Well it is not bullshit - irrespective of whether it is right or wrong the Rohingya are not citizens of Myanmar and will not be taken back - if a country will not take them then there is nothing Australia can do about it. Whatever airline takes him there will have to bring him back to Aust as soon as the aircraft lands.

    For sure if another country will take him problem solved but no country will.

    Willing something to happen does not mean it will happen.

  • #10
    LSemmens
    lsemmens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Rural South OZ
    Posts
    10,585
    Thanks
    11,868
    Thanked 7,061 Times in 3,338 Posts
    Rep Power
    3153
    Reputation
    132592

    Default

    The Rohingya community was recognized as an indigenous ethnic nationality of Burma, with members of the group serving as representatives in the , as well as ministers, parliamentary secretaries, and other high-ranking government positions. But since took control of the country in 1962, the Rohingya have been systematically deprived of their political rights
    Myanmar or Burma is certainly their origin, regardless of the current regime's attempts to deny it. Send him back there on a leaky boat.
    I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message...

  • #11
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,508
    Thanks
    962
    Thanked 474 Times in 290 Posts
    Rep Power
    391
    Reputation
    7181

    Default

    use him for cray bait

  • #12
    Premium Member
    alpha0ne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Mandurah WA
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,443
    Thanks
    3,455
    Thanked 2,988 Times in 813 Posts
    Rep Power
    1427
    Reputation
    59477

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by efab View Post
    use him for cray bait
    Why would you want to ruin perfectly good crays ??

  • #13
    Senior Member
    Uncle Fester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Commonly found in a pantry or the bottom of a fridge, searching for grains, fermented or distilled
    Posts
    6,405
    Thanks
    2,289
    Thanked 4,414 Times in 2,517 Posts
    Rep Power
    2046
    Reputation
    81778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    . Whatever airline takes him there will have to bring him back to Aust as soon as the aircraft lands.
    .
    Who said the aircrat has to land.
    Update: A deletion of features that work well and ain't broke but are deemed outdated in order to add things that are up to date and broken.
    Compatibility: A word soon to be deleted from our dictionaries as it is outdated.
    Humans: Entities that are not only outdated but broken... AI-self-learning-update-error...terminate...terminate...

  • The Following User Says Thank You to Uncle Fester For This Useful Post:

    DB44 (23-09-17)

  • #14
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,504
    Thanks
    1,879
    Thanked 1,590 Times in 726 Posts
    Rep Power
    767
    Reputation
    27988

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    Well it is not bullshit - irrespective of whether it is right or wrong the Rohingya are not citizens of Myanmar and will not be taken back - if a country will not take them then there is nothing Australia can do about it. Whatever airline takes him there will have to bring him back to Aust as soon as the aircraft lands.

    For sure if another country will take him problem solved but no country will.

    Willing something to happen does not mean it will happen.
    He is described in the article as "a Burmese Asylum Seeker". If the situation is that Australia rejects his claim for asylum but still can't get rid of him the situation is "bullshit". Unacceptable. Should never be allowed to happen or be repeated. We owe him nothing. In such a case he should be kept under tight security and allowed to rot in Immigration detention!

  • #15
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,508
    Thanks
    962
    Thanked 474 Times in 290 Posts
    Rep Power
    391
    Reputation
    7181

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alpha0ne View Post
    Why would you want to ruin perfectly good crays ??
    I reckon they taste like shit and are over priced for the average person so they both should sit at the bottom of the ocean

  • Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •