eaglem (21-09-17),Keith (23-09-17),OSIRUS (20-09-17),Tiny (20-09-17),VroomVroom (20-09-17)
Another one, and a particularly stupid one at that.
And he was charged only with going through with the marriage ceremony with an underage person. Charges of having sex with her were dropped. I'm sure he will find someone who wants to protect him in prison if he is even sentenced to it, but I doubt his protector will want to marry him.
Just total lack of respect for our culture and our laws. He shouldn't be going back to immigration detention. He should be going straight from prison to the airport. This isn't a case of looking at child porn. It isn't a case of talking over the phone about underage sex. He married and ####ed a 14 year old girl, even after a specific warning that it was illegal.
Also, where were the child protection authorities? Why weren't the police waiting to arrest him on completion of the ceremony?
Last edited by DB44; 20-09-17 at 04:52 PM.
eaglem (21-09-17),Keith (23-09-17),OSIRUS (20-09-17),Tiny (20-09-17),VroomVroom (20-09-17)
Look Here -> |
Bullshit! Send him back to Myanmar. Even if he needs our protection, he has forfeited any claim to it. Perhaps some of his charitable brethren in the Middle East will take him. He might even like it there. He can marry and #### even younger girls. I understand 6 is okay for marriage and 9 for consummation.
Last edited by DB44; 21-09-17 at 12:22 PM.
Well, he was only given a 12 month sentence, which he has served almost that much in custody, so he's due for release in a couple of weeks, but will then go back into immigration detention.
He was only in Australia on a bridging visa, so I see no issue with deporting him.
He was fully aware of Australian law re marriage to minors, but he chose to ignore it.
He should be prosecuted for rape as well IMHO.
The girl's mother also needs to be charged, convicted, sentenced and deported (if not an Australian citizen).
When a guest pisses in your house .....
eaglem (22-09-17)
I'm with DB44 and mtv on this one.
He deliberately chose to break the law after being advised not to do it and lied on his statement. How child sex charges were not substantiated is beyond me.
garrycol is correct in that it is a tricky one given his ethnicity, but having said that, why should we have him ? Send him back.
He will come back but this time with a BOMB. These people should not be in the country to start with (Go Pauline). People don't understand them as if some of them you piss them off they will retaliate back there are not like us that the Police/Government/ A government department dictate us and put us down we just cop it and that it but rub the wrong Muslim up the wrong way they will get there revenge back. This will happen one day and watch the authority here put blame on each other.
Well it is not bullshit - irrespective of whether it is right or wrong the Rohingya are not citizens of Myanmar and will not be taken back - if a country will not take them then there is nothing Australia can do about it. Whatever airline takes him there will have to bring him back to Aust as soon as the aircraft lands.
For sure if another country will take him problem solved but no country will.
Willing something to happen does not mean it will happen.
Myanmar or Burma is certainly their origin, regardless of the current regime's attempts to deny it. Send him back there on a leaky boat.The Rohingya community was recognized as an indigenous ethnic nationality of Burma, with members of the group serving as representatives in the , as well as ministers, parliamentary secretaries, and other high-ranking government positions. But since took control of the country in 1962, the Rohingya have been systematically deprived of their political rights
I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message...
use him for cray bait
Update: A deletion of features that work well and ain't broke but are deemed outdated in order to add things that are up to date and broken.
Compatibility: A word soon to be deleted from our dictionaries as it is outdated.
Humans: Entities that are not only outdated but broken... AI-self-learning-update-error...terminate...terminate...
DB44 (23-09-17)
He is described in the article as "a Burmese Asylum Seeker". If the situation is that Australia rejects his claim for asylum but still can't get rid of him the situation is "bullshit". Unacceptable. Should never be allowed to happen or be repeated. We owe him nothing. In such a case he should be kept under tight security and allowed to rot in Immigration detention!
Bookmarks