View Poll Results: Should Voting Be Optional in Australia ?

Voters
34. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, only vote if you want to

    14 41.18%
  • No, everyone should be forced to vote

    18 52.94%
  • Unsure

    2 5.88%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: Should Voting Be Optional in Australia ?

  1. #1
    Administrator
    admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Age
    56
    Posts
    31,150
    Thanks
    2,238
    Thanked 13,731 Times in 5,823 Posts
    Rep Power
    4553
    Reputation
    165805

    Default Should Voting Be Optional in Australia ?

    A pretty straightforward one.

    My opinion ? No, it should be compulsory.

    Political decisions affect you, so you should vote for what party and its policies you support. When they stuff up, you can then say "I voted for these idiots" and change your vote next time if you think there is a better option.

    Many countries have optional voting, however I think it leads to more and more idiocy of parties trying to "buy" your vote from you. Having said that, we have a very populist opposition in Federal power who will promise anything to be elected.

    Your thoughts ? There is no right answer here of course.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to admin For This Useful Post:

    tristen (12-10-17)



Look Here ->
  • #2
    Premium Member
    alpha0ne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Mandurah WA
    Age
    68
    Posts
    1,443
    Thanks
    3,455
    Thanked 2,988 Times in 813 Posts
    Rep Power
    1427
    Reputation
    59477

    Default

    Yes, it must be, otherwise we might end up with a system similar to what they have in the US.................................ohhh wait !!!!!!

  • #3
    Administrator
    admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Age
    56
    Posts
    31,150
    Thanks
    2,238
    Thanked 13,731 Times in 5,823 Posts
    Rep Power
    4553
    Reputation
    165805

    Default

    I just edited the responses as the question and answers were confusing.

  • #4
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,856
    Thanks
    1,061
    Thanked 904 Times in 511 Posts
    Rep Power
    503
    Reputation
    12237

    Default

    Voted unsure: It's compulsory to turn up to the ballot box. Not compulsory to actually vote.

    So either way I don't think it makes much difference.

    If it goes online the choice to donkey out might be removed. That might be interesting.

    Anyone know if other countries have online voting?

  • The Following User Says Thank You to exited For This Useful Post:

    loanrangiel (13-10-17)

  • #5
    Super Moderator
    enf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canberra
    Age
    70
    Posts
    17,792
    Thanks
    16,849
    Thanked 35,076 Times in 9,093 Posts
    Rep Power
    13726
    Reputation
    646729

    Default

    I voted yes. There was a time when I would have said no, but experience has shown me that people need a bit of a rocket up their collective arses to do something.

    You don't have to vote anyway, but if you HAVE to attend, you may as well....

    The reality is that 48% give or take vote for football teams anyway, and a few swinging voters decide the issue. I am one of these....good or bad. The fact that I no longer have ANY faith in either side makes it easier to decide whats in it for me, an attitude that mimicks our politicians anyway.
    The fact that there's a highway to hell and a stairway to heaven says a lot about the anticipated traffic flow.

  • #6
    Premium Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Central Tablelands of NSW
    Age
    81
    Posts
    13,824
    Thanks
    1,242
    Thanked 3,806 Times in 2,525 Posts
    Rep Power
    1798
    Reputation
    56986

    Default

    Its only compulsory to have your name marked off the role but not to actually mark the ballot form in any way.

    In a perfect situation, voting should not be compulsory but I remember when they made Council elections non compulsory and I dont think the got 40 % turnout.

    My attitude is if you DONT Vote, you get the Government you deserve.
    I know this is countered by saying that people could still turn up and either not mark the form or its not done properly but I believe that once the person has got to the ballot box, they will fill out the form correctly.
    I am basing this thought after being a scrutineer and seeing the ballot papers after they were removed from the Ballot box's and how few were either blank, defaced or a genuine error to make them Informal.
    All you get after the count is how many were classed as Informal, not WHY they were !!!
    Informal includes Blank, Scribbled on, marked with a X instead of a tick, numbers incorrect, 1,2,3,3 4,5, OR 1,2,4,5,6...A,B.C instead of numbers.

    Keep voting, at least when things go wrong (and they do) you can stand up to the Jerk you elected, you aint voting for them again.
    I stand unequivicably behind everything I say , I just dont ever remember saying it !!

  • #7
    Premium Member

    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Launceston, Tasmania
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    214
    Thanked 154 Times in 71 Posts
    Rep Power
    178
    Reputation
    3090

    Default

    I will vote when there is someone worth voting for.......I will never have to vote as politicians are all a bunch
    of self serving thieves. How can you vote for someone who is not a politician?

  • #8
    Banned

    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    277
    Thanks
    116
    Thanked 559 Times in 150 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    11190

    Default

    Australians are generally very apathetic about most things, without compulsory voting the voter turnout probably will be very low. We already have a problem with crooks getting into politics, with voluntary voting it is likely that it will only be crooks voting and electing even worse crooks into parliament or the council.

    However I believe that we need another option on the voting paper, this is that we should have a "None of the above" option. Often the whole lot of candidates are 'wishy washy' or crooked, why must we be forced to vote for anyone we don't want.

    I can see such an option causing potential problems, my way of handling this is - if the "None of the above" gets the majority of votes, none are elected, the parties are told to come up with new candidates, and are present with a bill for the cost of the new election. These measures may force parties to present us with worthy candidates.

  • The Following User Says Thank You to Neddie For This Useful Post:

    Uncle Fester (12-10-17)

  • #9
    LSemmens
    lsemmens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Rural South OZ
    Posts
    10,609
    Thanks
    11,886
    Thanked 7,073 Times in 3,346 Posts
    Rep Power
    3159
    Reputation
    132832

    Default

    Not a bad idea, Neddie. I did vote optional, however, I'd go so far as to suggest that we vote for a Board of directors who then appoint a CEO to run the country, just like any other big company. You fail to perform, you are out of a job.
    I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message...

  • #10
    Member
    madtech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Out of the city
    Posts
    365
    Thanks
    89
    Thanked 389 Times in 150 Posts
    Rep Power
    356
    Reputation
    7270

    Default

    I to am in favour of compulsory, but with the addition of 'None of the above' as an option. The rules for this is that if None of the above gets more than its average percentage the seat to be recalled with none of the original candidates allowed to recontest the seat. eg if 3 candidates + none of the above (4 options) if none of the above gets more than 25% of the vote then seat recalled etc.
    I like Neddies idea of making the failed candidates responsible for the cost of the rerun election.
    Also all donations should be banned, be they from private individuals, developers, unions, business etc. Each candidate should be given an amount that they can spend, that MUST be accounted for. If they spend more then the candidate themselves has to pay the treasury 10 x the overspend amount.

  • #11
    Senior Member
    Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Tassi
    Posts
    4,174
    Thanks
    4,173
    Thanked 3,474 Times in 1,534 Posts
    Rep Power
    1343
    Reputation
    52015

    Default

    I voted No, because regardless your vote the bastards do what they want anyway

  • The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Rick For This Useful Post:

    alpha0ne (13-10-17),gamve (13-10-17),VroomVroom (13-10-17)

  • #12
    Senior Member
    Reschs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Outside a few schooners
    Posts
    3,081
    Thanks
    913
    Thanked 2,149 Times in 1,059 Posts
    Rep Power
    934
    Reputation
    33278

    Default

    If it is optional, only the Minority Groups will lobby up and win.

  • The Following User Says Thank You to Reschs For This Useful Post:

    Tiny (13-10-17)

  • #13
    Premium Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,311
    Thanks
    5,982
    Thanked 4,171 Times in 1,771 Posts
    Rep Power
    1349
    Reputation
    50392

    Default

    I have always found we Australians to be a very apathetic lot in general.

    I agree that without compulsory voting a large proportion of the populace would fail to vote, due mainly to laziness or lack of interest.

    Having talked to many people from overseas countries, including some where political corruption is a way of life, education, justice and health services, to name a few, are available only to the rich and influentual, I have come to realise just how fortunate we are to live where we do, geographically and politically.

    I value my (Australian) way of life and consider it a privilege to be able to have a say in what political group governs this magnificent land where I have been born, raised, educated, employed and lived a generally fulfilling life.

    With privilege comes responsibility.

    Don't ignore or throw away your right to vote through disillusionment, apathy, ignorance or laziness.

    The day could very well come when what you currently consider to be an imposition will be denied to you.

    Read, listen, learn and educate yourself politically in order to have your say while you are able to!

  • The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to tristen For This Useful Post:

    admin (13-10-17),lsemmens (13-10-17),mtv (13-10-17),Tiny (13-10-17)

  • #14
    Senior Member
    Uncle Fester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Commonly found in a pantry or the bottom of a fridge, searching for grains, fermented or distilled
    Posts
    6,412
    Thanks
    2,292
    Thanked 4,420 Times in 2,521 Posts
    Rep Power
    2048
    Reputation
    81898

    Default

    Not compulsory, with those not turning up counted as NONE OF THE ABOVE.
    So if we get 30% blue and 30% red and 40% did not vote, they have to keep doing it again until more people become motivated to vote.

    Our politicians need to earn our vote.
    Right now there is not even a lesser evil to vote, there is NOBODY (who has a chance of getting the numbers) worthy of my vote.

    WE should get a paper where we choose on issues that need to be addressed, including our own suggestions and not a couple of f@$*kwit parties.

    I HATE ALL THIS RIGHT-LEFT SHIT.
    Update: A deletion of features that work well and ain't broke but are deemed outdated in order to add things that are up to date and broken.
    Compatibility: A word soon to be deleted from our dictionaries as it is outdated.
    Humans: Entities that are not only outdated but broken... AI-self-learning-update-error...terminate...terminate...

  • #15
    Administrator
    admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Age
    56
    Posts
    31,150
    Thanks
    2,238
    Thanked 13,731 Times in 5,823 Posts
    Rep Power
    4553
    Reputation
    165805

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reschs View Post
    If it is optional, only the Minority Groups will lobby up and win.
    THIS. IN CAPITAL LETTERS.

    We would have more leftist lunacy than what we already have.

  • #16
    Administrator
    admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Age
    56
    Posts
    31,150
    Thanks
    2,238
    Thanked 13,731 Times in 5,823 Posts
    Rep Power
    4553
    Reputation
    165805

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tristen View Post
    I have always found we Australians to be a very apathetic lot in general.

    I agree that without compulsory voting a large proportion of the populace would fail to vote, due mainly to laziness or lack of interest.

    Having talked to many people from overseas countries, including some where political corruption is a way of life, education, justice and health services, to name a few, are available only to the rich and influentual, I have come to realise just how fortunate we are to live where we do, geographically and politically.

    I value my (Australian) way of life and consider it a privilege to be able to have a say in what political group governs this magnificent land where I have been born, raised, educated, employed and lived a generally fulfilling life.

    With privilege comes responsibility.

    Don't ignore or throw away your right to vote through disillusionment, apathy, ignorance or laziness.

    The day could very well come when what you currently consider to be an imposition will be denied to you.

    Read, listen, learn and educate yourself politically in order to have your say while you are able to!
    Very well said tristen !

    Imagine living in a country where you dont even get to vote and just have a loony despot running the country with his military.

    Thank god we got rid of Kevin Rudd in time.

  • #17
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,705
    Thanks
    228
    Thanked 1,118 Times in 573 Posts
    Rep Power
    640
    Reputation
    20844

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lsemmens View Post
    I'd go so far as to suggest that we vote for a Board of directors who then appoint a CEO to run the country, just like any other big company. You fail to perform, you are out of a job.
    Not so different to the current system, really. The leader of a political party (ie CEO) is selected by the members (ie the Board) and we vote for those members to sit in parliament. They don’t (or shouldn’t) get re-elected if they fail to perform.

  • #18
    Administrator
    mtv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    19,909
    Thanks
    7,518
    Thanked 15,074 Times in 6,765 Posts
    Rep Power
    5651
    Reputation
    239465

    Default

    I think we all should have our say, whatever that is, so compulsory for me.

    Unfortunately, we all tend to just vote for the most convincing liars at the time.

    They all deliberately lie and make false promises.

  • #19
    Senior Member
    Guiseppe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,604
    Thanks
    1,057
    Thanked 413 Times in 279 Posts
    Rep Power
    367
    Reputation
    7224

    Default

    With my signature my thoughts are obvious. To improve the system the following needs to be done:

    1. No compulsory voting. There have to be conditions of course like the winning party has to win a majority whether that is in their own right or a coalition, etc., etc.

    2. Get rid of the preferential voting system. Unless you are very lucky and your 1# candidate wins then all you are doing, in reality, is voting for either of the two major parties because that candidate gives his/her preferences to either one.

    3. Mandatory fixed terms. None of this, "We are on the crest of the wave so we will have an election and get another full term."
    If Australia is a democracy why, then, is voting compulsory?

    "What has changed between the arrival of the First Fleet and today?"
    "Wearing leg irons is now not required."

  • #20
    Crazy Diamond
    Tiny's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Tasmania
    Age
    64
    Posts
    6,393
    Thanks
    11,000
    Thanked 5,437 Times in 2,652 Posts
    Rep Power
    2156
    Reputation
    89077

    Default

    I voted no, + 100% what tristen said post #13
    Cheers, Tiny
    "You can lead a person to knowledge, but you can't make them think? If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.
    The information is out there; you just have to let it in."

  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •