Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Do I Convert older WiFi Transmitters to Repeaters or Extenders?

  1. #1
    Member statesmanjeff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    391
    Thanks
    95
    Thanked 31 Times in 20 Posts
    Rep Power
    214
    Reputation
    462

    Default Do I Convert older WiFi Transmitters to Repeaters or Extenders?

    I have about 6 of old and new WiFi Acces Points.
    I have a narrow but very long yard. I would like to place transmitters at regular distances, Have them ALL LAN WIRED back to my router.
    Id like to walk from one end of my yard to the other while downloading a "whatever" on the net and have my lap top change from Transmitter 1 to 2 to 3 to 4 to 5 to 6 , without having to join each transmitter and without cutting out my connection.
    Similar to your mobile phone where it can change towers but you keep talking totally unaware (unless your with Vodafone).
    I have heard of DD-WRT but need to be advised what would be the best set up for my situation.
    Extender mode, Repeater mode ???? Which will give me no dropout but change transmitters automatically? Or is there a better way to go that im not aware of???



Look Here ->
  • #2
    Senior Member
    weirdo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,458
    Thanks
    4,638
    Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,633 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    29602

    Default

    Jeff in his backyard in the near future >

  • The Following User Says Thank You to weirdo For This Useful Post:

    Tiny (01-03-13)

  • #3
    Premium Member
    ol' boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    17,662
    Thanks
    8,131
    Thanked 10,460 Times in 5,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    4472
    Reputation
    184272

    Default

    The answer is NO... you will not get "Cell Tower" like roaming from domestic gear.
    If you'd like to spend $5000 for commercial gear, you may get those results.

    Some people "Claim" that using range extenders gives them glitch free streaming across multiple AP's.... but in practise, it just doesn't work.
    With "Enterprise" equipment you will see an improvement.... but still not glitch free.

    You need multi channel, Same ID, full blown roaming....

    Do some reading on networking forums, you'll soon realise, there is NO SUCH BEAST in the common mans budget, no matter what people claim to tell you!

    In your scenario, you are better off with a good AP, an antenna that suits your block and an Apple MacBook that picks up the weakest signal from 1 kilometer away!!!

    The deafness of your equipment is your largest problem, my Macbook Pro finds available networks, 800 meters away from when my windows laptops finds them

    Last edited by ol' boy; 01-03-13 at 06:38 PM.

  • #4
    Administrator
    mtv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    19,908
    Thanks
    7,518
    Thanked 15,074 Times in 6,765 Posts
    Rep Power
    5651
    Reputation
    239465

    Default

    Narrow but very long...... sounds like a yagi antenna at one location (house?) pointed toward the far end of your property may be an ideal solution.

    Plenty of gain and narrow beamwidth and connected to a single router.

    Worth a try.

  • #5
    Senior Member autotuner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    I have no idea...
    Posts
    518
    Thanks
    93
    Thanked 209 Times in 134 Posts
    Rep Power
    221
    Reputation
    1279

    Default

    oceanboy is right. Standard consumer stuff doesn't live up to the expectations. Windows has a reluctance to release a session with an AP once it is established, even if there is another AP with better signal, and when it does release there is no seamless handover. I have seen some attempts, but they never seemed to work properly.
    The big players , Cisco etc, have proprietary drivers for their solutions, which does do a seamless handover between "cells" but there is a $$$ attached to the AP's and backend magic.

    And ditto to what MTV said...

    Geez I am in agreeable mood tonight....
    Last edited by autotuner; 01-03-13 at 06:53 PM. Reason: addition
    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy...

  • #6
    Premium Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Central Tablelands of NSW
    Age
    81
    Posts
    13,824
    Thanks
    1,242
    Thanked 3,806 Times in 2,525 Posts
    Rep Power
    1798
    Reputation
    56986

    Default

    Looking at MTV's suggestion of a Yagi located at one end, how about one those USB Wifi 'adaptors' that have a 'Rubber Ducky' type antenna that can be unscrewed used on the devise IF it has the option of using USB.
    My old ACER travelmate WiFi card died so I replaced it with one of those and because the Battery is dead in the ACER, I cant go wandering about with it to see just how far I could take it away.
    I stand unequivicably behind everything I say , I just dont ever remember saying it !!

  • #7
    Premium Member
    ol' boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    17,662
    Thanks
    8,131
    Thanked 10,460 Times in 5,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    4472
    Reputation
    184272

    Default

    Tx is one thing.... Rx is another, an antenna wont solve the real problem.

    Deafness and Handover

  • #8
    Administrator
    mtv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    19,908
    Thanks
    7,518
    Thanked 15,074 Times in 6,765 Posts
    Rep Power
    5651
    Reputation
    239465

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oceanboy View Post
    Tx is one thing.... Rx is another, an antenna wont solve the real problem.

    Deafness and Handover
    I disagree.

    With the antenna connected only to a single router, there is no 'handover'.

    A yagi provides higer gain for both TX and RX.

  • #9
    Premium Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,311
    Thanks
    5,982
    Thanked 4,171 Times in 1,771 Posts
    Rep Power
    1349
    Reputation
    50392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mtv View Post
    Narrow but very long...... sounds like a yagi antenna at one location (house?) pointed toward the far end of your property may be an ideal solution.

    Plenty of gain and narrow beamwidth and connected to a single router.

    Worth a try.
    That's a very good suggestion and one well worth experimenting with.

    I do not see any reason whatsoever why it will not work perfectly.

    Commercially made yagi antennae for wifi use are readily available, but here are some links to get statesmanjeff (and interested others) started on the DIY variety ...









    Statesmanjeff, please keep us informed regarding your progress.

    (As I have a 100m. deep block, I might try it myself if I can find the time to do so).

  • #10
    Premium Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,311
    Thanks
    5,982
    Thanked 4,171 Times in 1,771 Posts
    Rep Power
    1349
    Reputation
    50392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mtv View Post
    I disagree.

    With the antenna connected only to a single router, there is no 'handover'.

    A yagi provides higer gain for both TX and RX.
    Totally correct.

    (1) No "handover" and (2) higher gain resulting in greater range (distance) on both transmit AND receive.

    In my view, perfect for the OP's application.

  • #11
    Senior Member
    weirdo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,458
    Thanks
    4,638
    Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,633 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    29602

    Default

    I just ordered one of these to try out on my Billion router
    Trying to get reception out to my outdoor spa

  • #12
    Senior Member
    best4less's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,684
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 2,207 Times in 1,132 Posts
    Rep Power
    758
    Reputation
    15165

    Default

    Wow that is so cheep
    When you do things right, people won't be sure that you have done anything at all

  • #13
    Senior Member
    weirdo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,458
    Thanks
    4,638
    Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,633 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    29602

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by best4less View Post
    Wow that is so cheep
    stop making me feel so guilty

  • #14
    Senior Member
    best4less's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,684
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 2,207 Times in 1,132 Posts
    Rep Power
    758
    Reputation
    15165

    Default

    Looks very small too :P
    When you do things right, people won't be sure that you have done anything at all

  • #15
    Senior Member
    weirdo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,458
    Thanks
    4,638
    Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,633 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    29602

    Default

    lol
    thanks
    it's probably shite

  • #16
    Premium Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,311
    Thanks
    5,982
    Thanked 4,171 Times in 1,771 Posts
    Rep Power
    1349
    Reputation
    50392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weirdo View Post
    I just ordered one of these to try out on my Billion router
    Trying to get reception out to my outdoor spa
    Thanks for posting those details, Weirdo.

    I've ordered one myself to try.

    I'll post my findings when it has arrived and I have had time to test it.

    If it is shite, I'll blame you.

  • #17
    Administrator
    mtv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    19,908
    Thanks
    7,518
    Thanked 15,074 Times in 6,765 Posts
    Rep Power
    5651
    Reputation
    239465

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by best4less View Post
    Wow that is so cheep
    $11.50 including delivery..... nothing to lose trying one.

    Apart from the U bolts shown mounted on the wrong side of the plate and a crappy non-UV resistant cable tie shown in the pics, the specs look good.

    A folded dipole gives it a broader bandwidth.

    Sure, it's probably not as well built as higher-quality commercial antennas, but at 2.4GHz, it's small enough not to have a lot of wind loading.

    I'll be interested to hear how they go for you, fellas.

  • #18
    Senior Member
    weirdo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,458
    Thanks
    4,638
    Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,633 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    29602

    Default

    how important is direct line of sight for reception mtv?
    With the 1.5 meter lead that comes with it it probably won't get above my gutter line which still means a brick corner of wall in direct los.
    I might have to make the lead longer if that matters.

  • #19
    Administrator
    mtv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    19,908
    Thanks
    7,518
    Thanked 15,074 Times in 6,765 Posts
    Rep Power
    5651
    Reputation
    239465

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weirdo View Post
    how important is direct line of sight for reception mtv?
    With the 1.5 meter lead that comes with it it probably won't get above my gutter line which still means a brick corner of wall in direct los.
    I might have to make the lead longer if that matters.
    At those frequencies, LOS can be critical.

    A bit of foliage at a distance will have less effect, but having a brick wall close to the antenna could block most of the signal.

    The antenna doesn't necessarily have to be very high, but it does need a fairly clear path.

    Higher generally increases signal distance though.

    A 1.5m cable is pretty useless on a yagi, unless you can mount your router that close to it, so yes, an extension cable is likely in most cases.

    Use the lowest-loss 50 ohm cable you can afford.
    Last edited by mtv; 06-03-13 at 04:04 AM. Reason: added info

  • The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mtv For This Useful Post:

    jimbo123 (07-03-13),weirdo (06-03-13)

  • Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •