irritant (15-02-17)
carjackma (14-02-17)
The data presented at such sites as Satbeams (or Lyngsat and others) is not always correct.
The best place to check satellite footprint beams is ALWAYS the website of the satellite owner/operator, which in this case is Indosat.
I believe that their website is located at
Vertical transponders have always been extremely weak in Australia for 113 degrees east.
Many years ago, a friend wanted to watch programs on a transponder with vertical polarity. He sought my advice and subsequently installed a 4.6m mesh dish, which gave him reliable reception. The downside was extremely high wind loading necessitating the dish be "parked" with its back to the wind whenever a storm approached.
janosvitesse (15-02-17)
I don't think they are all that accurate as I get most verticals in Perth on a 3.7 meter dish and according to the footprints I shouldn't get any.
What I find strange is one of the beams covers east Australia and yet people are still having trouble receiving some transponders where as I don't and it Doesn't even cover me in Perth.
The footprint contours for the "Global/Asia" beam are only 1dBW apart, so extrapolating to Perth likely gives you an ~32-33dBW signal. Your 3.7 metre dish can obviously handle the weaker signal footprint just fine. Just look at the West Hemi beam for IS-19. Satbeams recommends a 2.7m reflector for a 34.9dBW signal over Perth/Melbourne. I can access several transponders on the West Hemi beam just fine with a 2.5m solid. Your 3.7 metre dish theoretically has ~ +3dB more gain than a 2.7 metre reflector which clearly compensates for the weaker signal over Perth. I agree with others in that these beam footprints are only indicative and who knows if all of the transponders on a particular satellite are all outputting the same RF power any way.
Bookmarks