You are of course correct. My comment is, as you say, in no way irrelevant. You seem to have got at least that right, though by accident. And it is a comment, not an example. It's relevance lies in illustrating the ridiculous nature of your comment. Homosexuality is, of course, not illegal now, nor should it be. But it once was. And if we keep pandering to extremist minorities than paedophilia may one day also be legal.
Hardly unexpectedly, you chose to avoid the real questions. Homosexuality is now tolerated and accepted by most reasonable people. And it seems that this is not enough for the activists, as the Spectator article you so deliberately chose to ignore shows. It seems that we must, if they have their way, embrace and promote it.
Bookmarks