Look Here -> |
Very necessary. We don't want drones flying around airports and shutting down flights do we ?
all this proves is that drone flying legistration doesnt work? so instead of complicating the position why not rewrite the legistration
Last edited by hinekadon; 13-05-19 at 08:43 AM. Reason: spelling
I can't wait until these jammers are available for purchase online, every tourist and his dog wants to fly their supercharged mosquito on a nice day around here
The beach areas are banned (apparently) but there are no signs
If u want to go on an expedition get a Land Rover, if u want to come home from an expedition get a Landcruiser!
"There" instead of "Their"... seriously?
Are even (so-called) professional writers illiterate these days?!
Andrew
Yep mighty fine but who,s to say they are using that band/s so we get a cop playing with a jammer trying every frequency possible sound like a great deal of commonsense has just grown wings and flown away , disaster waiting to happen !!!!so Is he responsible for the mayhem he creates or are we just going to say oops sorry thirty people have died as a result of a untrained dick playing with something he knows nothing about . No wait a minute lets just make it legal for the cops to do it and see how many do get killed by their wifi going down with interferrence after all they dont matter they are only the general public ????????
This looks like a pretty good solution to me.
Kamikaze DroneBullet Knocks Enemy UAVs Out Of The Sky
CEO of AerialX Noam Kenig describes the DroneBullet as a “hybrid between a missile and a quadcopter.” It's basically a kamikaze drone which looks like a missile but has flight characteristics of a quadcopter.
The drone can reach speeds in excessive of 200 mph in a dive attack. It's designed to lock onto enemy drones with its camera and various neural net-based components, which allows it to knock the target out of the sky.
Sorry, OB, but I doubt that you'll be able to get one on eBay
This does the same thing only much cheaper...
Andrew
lsemmens (14-05-19)
Bullets from a gun do not lock onto the target and stray bullets can kill people but I guess most of you don't give a f... about that, as long it is fun.
Update: A deletion of features that work well and ain't broke but are deemed outdated in order to add things that are up to date and broken.
Compatibility: A word soon to be deleted from our dictionaries as it is outdated.
Humans: Entities that are not only outdated but broken... AI-self-learning-update-error...terminate...terminate...
hinekadon (14-05-19)
you should only shoot things you are going to eat morally correct is the new pc
Uncle Fester (14-05-19)
And what happens to the debris from a mid-air collision of two drones over a public area, especially when one is doing "speeds in excessive of 200 mph in a dive attack"?
I think I'd much rather have tiny shotgun pellets falling on me under their own weight than be hit on the head by even just the battery from a drone, let alone a million shards of carbon fibre!
Andrew
A load of shotgun pellets hitting a drone will also result in a million shards of carbon fibre as well as a 100% burning Li-Ion battery falling down on me.
I am more concerned about the likely event that the shooter MISSES the drone and that they might NOT use shotgun pellets but something more substantial.
Update: A deletion of features that work well and ain't broke but are deemed outdated in order to add things that are up to date and broken.
Compatibility: A word soon to be deleted from our dictionaries as it is outdated.
Humans: Entities that are not only outdated but broken... AI-self-learning-update-error...terminate...terminate...
Update: A deletion of features that work well and ain't broke but are deemed outdated in order to add things that are up to date and broken.
Compatibility: A word soon to be deleted from our dictionaries as it is outdated.
Humans: Entities that are not only outdated but broken... AI-self-learning-update-error...terminate...terminate...
Quite so, but at least there would only be one drone worth of debris, not two. And a shotgun isn't going to make a drone explode, nothing like a collision with another drone travelling at 200 MPH would anyway!
If it's safe to use this "Drone Bullet" then the same conditions must obviously apply to other means?
So what are we talking about now, surface-to-air missiles? Anti-aircraft batteries? Maybe a space-based LASER platform?
You obviously have an issue with firearms, and they are off-topic here anyway, so I'll say no more about the subject. It was little more than an attempt at humour to begin with. Unsubscribed.
Andrew
Update: A deletion of features that work well and ain't broke but are deemed outdated in order to add things that are up to date and broken.
Compatibility: A word soon to be deleted from our dictionaries as it is outdated.
Humans: Entities that are not only outdated but broken... AI-self-learning-update-error...terminate...terminate...
It's ok fellas, I saw it as a joke and nothing more. Of course no one in their right mind is going to use a shotgun in a public place. The idea, though, does have some merit - except for the idiots who shouldn't be let anywhere near a pop gun, let alone a water pistol!
I'm out of my mind, but feel free to leave a message...
Bookmarks