works for me! a little slower than on its own dedicated IDE, but works!
I am running a 3 gig processor with a 1 gig of ram 675mhtz and I have the burner on the same IDE cable as the hard drive. I need 2 burn some dvd's do u think I will run into any problems. The burner has buffer under run technology.
Thanx for quick reply.
Swatty.
swatkat@bigpond.net.au
Look Here -> |
works for me! a little slower than on its own dedicated IDE, but works!
What r your pc specs if you dont mind replying.
Swatty
Last edited by swatkat; 10-02-08 at 12:52 PM. Reason: forgot my nik lol
it was on an old celeron 850 system 320 MB RAM. 30 GB HDD. it didn't like overclocking when running XP, so it now has Linux Novell SUSE 10 @ 1133 MHz. it was running XP when i had the burner and HDD on the same IDE. burner is a Lite-On DVD and CD burner.
i do mine about 10-12 min rip, 10-12 min burn
am2 4800 dual core(2.4) 2 gigs ram
sata hard drive to ide dvd.
you'll be right
only coppying from 1 disk to another causes probs
https://www.facebook.com/philquad68
i found that it doesnt have that much of a effect if its on the same ide channel even going from disc to disc on a older p4 machine.
most burning software has really good buffers and also the drives have it to.
not like the old 2x days where you had coasters left right and centre, media was really expensive asd well lol.
saying that you should technically have better performance if they are on different ide channels. Why not open it up and fix it up? Shouldnt take more than a couple of minutes.
goodluk
I only have the 1 ide channel as the sata connections r stuffed
Swatty.
Bookmarks