Originally Posted by
south_oz
the only heat produced in the engine is the coil , which of cause is natural with the flow of electricity threw it.. I have had the engine running for 72 hours on single 9.6 volt drill battery ,with no load it runs at approx 1000 rpm , connected to a commodore alternator it go's down to 850 rpm , atm i'm only testing the engine with power on every half revolution , this saves power and keeps down the heat in the coil , I am also just using the pull effect of the magnetic field of the coil which i do admit is less productive in sense that is no were near as effective as repelling the rare earth magnet , but that takes more power to coil but give the engine about 3 time more power an a lot more torch , but if I expand the size of the coil and the amounts of winds within the coil it will have a stronger magnetic field , generate less heat for the same amount of power input (yes I also know that the more winds of coils the resistance in the copper would suggest that i would need more power input) .. the material I have chosen for the coil center and case (as with the cylinder of the engine) has magnetic dampening properties that focuses the direction of the field . I have been studying this for many a years now and have no illusion there is a simple solution but i firmly believe there is a middle ground where you can put more out than what is being used to produce it , I have also started on a twin cylinder engine (just a bit larger than the one in the demo video) that uses a new coil design with material that wont be effected with heat .
Bookmarks