Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Windows 7

  1. #1
    Super Moderator
    Fernbay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    4,684
    Thanks
    1,515
    Thanked 3,458 Times in 1,141 Posts
    Rep Power
    671
    Reputation
    15830

    Default Windows 7



    Windows 7 Ultimate has been cracked. The pirate milestone, reached almost three months before Windows 7 is set to hit General Availability on October 22, 2009, was achieved via OEM instant offline activation that passes Windows Genuine Advantage validation and keeps the operating system permanently activated. Previous cracks weren't as solid: while they may be working now, they can easily be disabled by Microsoft. This one won't be so easy.

    Both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows 7 Ultimate can now easily be activated, according to My Digital Life. For Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Home Basic, and Windows 7 Starter, the OEM-System-Locked Preinstallation (SLP) keys haven't been leaked, so they cannot be OEM-activated yet. It won't be long before easy-to-use Windows 7 activation toolkits start appearing in the wild.

    The story begins with a Windows 7 Ultimate OEM DVD ISO from Lenovo leaking to a Chinese forum. The boot.wim file was then used to retrieve the OEM-SLP product key and OEM certificate for Windows 7 Ultimate. The SLP is a procedure used by Microsoft to preactivate
    Reality is an invention of my imagination.
    ಠ_ಠ

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Fernbay For This Useful Post:

    best4less (02-08-09),mutanti (31-07-09),myf360f1 (02-08-09),osci (31-07-09),tagg (31-07-09)



Look Here ->
  • #2
    Senior Member NoService's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Mainly Earth
    Posts
    1,062
    Thanks
    113
    Thanked 294 Times in 154 Posts
    Rep Power
    274
    Reputation
    2237

    Default

    well that's surprising isnt it , just like vista and xp MS cannot protect themselves

    NS
    The Early Bird May Get The Worm But Its The Second Mouse That Gets The Cheese!




  • #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    190
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 25 Times in 15 Posts
    Rep Power
    206
    Reputation
    81

    Default

    If they had fair deals at a fair price they would not need to protect it.

    Most people would pay $50-$100 for a full version of the top line product for home use on ALL home computers.

    At the end of the day most people want to do the right thing, but find it hard to justify the $$$. You will always get those that will just steal it, but that number will go down as people can afford the product.

  • The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to crypto7 For This Useful Post:

    best4less (02-08-09),Fixxxer (03-08-09)

  • #4
    Member Zero Alpha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    341
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 44 Times in 24 Posts
    Rep Power
    213
    Reputation
    191

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crypto7 View Post
    If they had fair deals at a fair price they would not need to protect it.

    Most people would pay $50-$100 for a full version of the top line product for home use on ALL home computers.

    At the end of the day most people want to do the right thing, but find it hard to justify the $$$. You will always get those that will just steal it, but that number will go down as people can afford the product.
    Its a little more complicated than that. Their price strategy is set for maximum profit and not minimal piracy. Its a strategy that has made them one of the richest corporations in the world. There is always going to be a section of the market who is not going to pay, it happens in every market. If microsoft wanted to stop those so called non paying customers then they could but why waste resources trying to do that as they would only move over to the many free available operating systems anyway.

    Does that make sense anyone?

  • #5
    Senior Member
    best4less's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,684
    Thanks
    3,487
    Thanked 2,207 Times in 1,132 Posts
    Rep Power
    758
    Reputation
    15165

    Default

    I have to agree with crypto7 if it was $50-$100 for the OS EVEN I would pay for it LOL
    When you do things right, people won't be sure that you have done anything at all

  • The Following User Says Thank You to best4less For This Useful Post:

    myf360f1 (02-08-09)

  • #6
    Senior Member roguefan99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,459
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 148 Times in 109 Posts
    Rep Power
    259
    Reputation
    633

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crypto7 View Post
    If they had fair deals at a fair price they would not need to protect it.

    Most people would pay $50-$100 for a full version of the top line product for home use on ALL home computers.
    .
    I'd even upgrade my Vista for that price, as long as its not a borked version of it (e.g. the lowest version).

    I think the reason why people dont buy OS is they figure they should get it free with the computer.
    Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta tell them exactly what you want or you'll end up with a cupboard full of pop tarts and pancake mix.

  • The Following User Says Thank You to roguefan99 For This Useful Post:

    myf360f1 (02-08-09)

  • #7
    Member SuperSize's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Gold Coast QLD
    Posts
    418
    Thanks
    27
    Thanked 37 Times in 14 Posts
    Rep Power
    214
    Reputation
    322

    Default

    I'm curious here, this time it seems like MS didn't even try to protect Windows 7.

    But something smells fishy, it seriously can't be that easy.
    I bet when anyone tries Windows Update it'll kill the crack....

  • #8
    Junior Member DevoDave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    98
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
    Rep Power
    201
    Reputation
    29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SuperSize View Post
    I'm curious here, this time it seems like MS didn't even try to protect Windows 7.
    It's probably not that... it's just that the mechanism to create BIOS's with OEM certificates embedded is now pretty well understood. M$ *HAVE* to have a way to allow their OEM clients to easily install a version that does not have to be activated. The evil do-ers amongst us take advantage of this.

    The LENOVO (used to be called IBM) OEM certificate was leaked, but my understanding is that M$ revoked that perticular certificate because no legal copies had made it out to customers yet. As soon as Windows7 hits the open market, a valid certificate will be extracted and released to the world and pirates will be dancing in the streets.

  • #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    19
    Thanked 11 Times in 8 Posts
    Rep Power
    199
    Reputation
    67

    Default

    due to ms market share of alot of computers in businesses. and how strict they are regarding software licences, microsoft doesnt really care too much for the home user who will use 1 licence, they care more about businesses.

    Volume Licencing is where it's at for them. can you imagine the Education Department's microsoft bill?

    staff are able to have vista business and office 2007 enterprise installed on one home computer also, im guessing the education department pays for that too?

    how many state schools and staff? thats a shitload of money for MS

  • #10
    Senior Member satboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,321
    Thanks
    50
    Thanked 101 Times in 65 Posts
    Rep Power
    253
    Reputation
    554

    Default

    Here is some interesting reading.


  • The Following User Says Thank You to satboy For This Useful Post:

    best4less (04-08-09)

  • Similar Threads

    1. windows MCE
      By gavpk in forum Operating Systems
      Replies: 6
      Last Post: 10-01-08, 10:35 AM

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •