Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 38 of 38

Thread: How to launch a 20g payload into orbit for $2000?

  1. #21
    Senior Member
    trash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tamworth
    Posts
    4,089
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 3,229 Times in 1,451 Posts
    Rep Power
    1288
    Reputation
    47674

    Default

    Potassium Nitrate is not the best oxidiser. Ammonium Nitrate is much better.
    While you only get 1 nitrogen and 3 oxygen atoms for Potassium nitrate,
    you get 2 nitrogen, 4 hydrogen and 3 oxygen atoms for Ammonium Nitrate.
    or two water molecules plus an oxygen. You can see a much larger production of gas.

    I guess the other way to consider it is from a minimalistic and conventional rocket and then build it bigger to compensate as you go.

    example. If the 20g projectile needs to be traveling 8000ms^-1 then a rocket providing 10ms^-2 thrust will take 800 seconds to reach that speed.
    13 minutes continuous burn.
    If we suggest a class D burns at 1cms^-1 then the rocket needs to be ~8 metres long.

    note, we're not even considering moving the mass of the fuel into orbit. just the payload.

    We could speed it up and say our little rocket has a thrust of 100ms^-2.
    Pulling 11g which isn't anything our payload couldn't handle.
    Crunch the numbers again...
    8000ms^1 / 100ms^-2 = 80 seconds. That's a hell quick ride into orbit !

    Not that it means anything, but we'll re-arrange the D engines into a cluster of 10, but now it's less than a metre long.

    Of course it still doesn't consider lifting the weight of all this fuel off the ground along the way. But it give us a sneak peak of how much is/isn't required.

    Hybrid Nitrous oxide solid fuel rockets offer the cheapest solution with a reasonable amount of thrust.
    Stacking clusters of them, first stage 4 engines, second stage a single engine and the third stage a single engine.

    So working on this combination, How big is big enough and can the engines lift the assembly ?



  • #22
    Premium Member
    Onefella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Top End
    Posts
    2,063
    Thanks
    1,062
    Thanked 1,360 Times in 678 Posts
    Rep Power
    639
    Reputation
    18622

    Default

    To keep costs down, how about a Hydrogen Peroxide/Kerosine engine?

    Good specific impulse rate and easy to source.

  • #23
    Senior Member
    trash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tamworth
    Posts
    4,089
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 3,229 Times in 1,451 Posts
    Rep Power
    1288
    Reputation
    47674

    Default

    and very hard to pump.

  • #24
    Premium Member
    Onefella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Top End
    Posts
    2,063
    Thanks
    1,062
    Thanked 1,360 Times in 678 Posts
    Rep Power
    639
    Reputation
    18622

    Default

    Why's that?

  • #25
    Senior Member
    trash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tamworth
    Posts
    4,089
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 3,229 Times in 1,451 Posts
    Rep Power
    1288
    Reputation
    47674

    Default

    Because you have to pump LOTS of kero and Peroxide is corrosive.
    It's not 2% peroxide, it's 100%.

    Big pump, more weight, more fuel required.

  • #26
    Premium Member
    Onefella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Top End
    Posts
    2,063
    Thanks
    1,062
    Thanked 1,360 Times in 678 Posts
    Rep Power
    639
    Reputation
    18622

    Default

    OK, sounds fair enough.

    Tried getting the wife's silver necklace to froth up in 6% H2O2 and nothing happened. Wish I could source it a bit stronger.

    Could you use a pre-pressurised cell in the rocket to 'pump' the two fuels?

  • #27
    Premium Member
    Onefella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Top End
    Posts
    2,063
    Thanks
    1,062
    Thanked 1,360 Times in 678 Posts
    Rep Power
    639
    Reputation
    18622

    Lightbulb

    I would like to purchase some "Hybrid Nitrous oxide solid fuel"?

  • #28
    Junior Member nathj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    200
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    205
    Reputation
    36

    Default

    onefella: H2O2 can be sourced from store bought crap at 3% all you need is a good glass distilation set up and collect everything above 140c as H2O2 boils at 150.3c your result would be 80% H2O2+

    and to pump H2O2 it would be done under pressure via a nitrogen resivour ,
    mechanical pumping would be a waste of time.


    trash: D motors? im not one to crunch numbers hence why i was pokeing your brain power but i was thinking along the lines of. 69kg of sugar, 128kg of potasium nitrate and 4kg of binder (special recipe binder). I know this is big but doable and very cheap!!!

    when i ran a simulation of 75kg of this sugar propelant at 100,000 feet ie rockoon. i got an altitude of 680km!!!

    so without the big idea of burning a 190kg candel it is doable on a 80kg of rocket straped to 85kg of lifting baloon. all of this can be made for under 4k which is in spec, the real problem i had other than the tracking of said satellite or getting a few hundred liters of H2. was inserting said satellite once at altitude into orbit???


    but even the 190kg of sugar made it into space so insering is the next thoreticle problem ??


    nj

  • #29
    Junior Member nathj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    200
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    205
    Reputation
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onefella View Post
    I would like to purchase some "Hybrid Nitrous oxide solid fuel"?
    sounds like you want some H2O2 for other purposes other than rocketry??? and solid N2O you must be tripin cause it would be at -90c to be a solid.!!! lol

    and H2O2 can be used as a rocket fuel at anything above 60%

  • #30
    Premium Member
    Onefella's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Top End
    Posts
    2,063
    Thanks
    1,062
    Thanked 1,360 Times in 678 Posts
    Rep Power
    639
    Reputation
    18622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nathj View Post
    sounds like you want some H2O2 for other purposes other than rocketry??? and solid N2O you must be tripin cause it would be at -90c to be a solid.!!! lol

    and H2O2 can be used as a rocket fuel at anything above 60%
    No, the H2O2 would only be used for rocket experimentation.

    I happen to have a still. But isn't it a bit dangerous getting Hydrogen Peroxide hot/concentrated/gaseous?

  • #31
    Senior Member
    trash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tamworth
    Posts
    4,089
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 3,229 Times in 1,451 Posts
    Rep Power
    1288
    Reputation
    47674

    Default

    Nitrous oxide / solid ... means the fuel is a solid, the oxidiser is the the N2O.
    They're common rockets. Richard Branson's Space ship one/two uses them.
    You can buy them as hobbiest rockets in the USA.
    It might be a little tricky refueling them here in oz, but if you're a member of the local rocketry club, they probably already have an account with BOC/CIG.

  • #32
    Junior Member nathj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    200
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    205
    Reputation
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Onefella View Post
    No, the H2O2 would only be used for rocket experimentation.

    I happen to have a still. But isn't it a bit dangerous getting Hydrogen Peroxide hot/concentrated/gaseous?

    no it should be fine, only problem is useing the 3% is the large amount you will need to get an amount of concentrated H2O2.

    best way is to buy hair bleeching gel from price line get the 40vol stuff around $8 a Liter, its about 12%. load into your distilation flask using a funell cause the hair bleech is a slow pouring jelly, collect everything and throw away up untill around 110C, keep everything above 110C up to 150C. you should get around 80% H2O2 the other 20% being water that formed an azeotrope (mixing of compounds that form a combination of B.P)with the h2o2 and an alcohole that they put into it.


    you should have the gel gunk left in the flask it will be charde its not toxic simply add some metho to disolve and throw away. they add this stuff so it will stay in your hair when you aply it.

    80% H2O2 should be good enough to use for rocketry, if you want stronger stuff you are going to need a fraction column to seperate the water and H2O2 more effectively.

  • #33
    Junior Member SCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney Aust.
    Age
    62
    Posts
    190
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 16 Times in 12 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    72

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Learjet View Post
    As mentioned in the other thread, the parameters for the prize are rather harsh and restrictive. Considering we are just hobbyists, it would be near impossible to put anything into orbit whatever the method, let alone with those restrictions.

    Maybe something a college or university could work on for a project where they have access to special equipment.

    It's out of my experience. Beyond balloon launches are where I run out of ideas.
    New news item from Universe Today.

    Seems these college students aren't far off doing it.

  • #34
    Junior Member nathj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    200
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    205
    Reputation
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SCT View Post
    New news item from Universe Today.

    Seems these college students aren't far off doing it.

    about 250,000 feet short of space

  • #35
    Senior Member
    Learjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Queensland
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,454
    Thanks
    650
    Thanked 1,203 Times in 391 Posts
    Rep Power
    565
    Reputation
    15945

    Default

    They got about 1/3 of the way there.

    I will try this one day. Was going to do a non retrievable launch and watch it via 1.2 GHz TV link. Would cost more in fuel to retrieve it than the cost of a camera.

  • #36
    Junior Member nathj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    200
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    205
    Reputation
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Learjet View Post
    They got about 1/3 of the way there.

    I will try this one day. Was going to do a non retrievable launch and watch it via 1.2 GHz TV link. Would cost more in fuel to retrieve it than the cost of a camera.

    not to mention the extra cost if you want gps location,

    what size rocket do you think you would need to reach space if launched at 100,000 feet? lear?

  • #37
    Senior Member
    Learjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Queensland
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,454
    Thanks
    650
    Thanked 1,203 Times in 391 Posts
    Rep Power
    565
    Reputation
    15945

    Default

    Absolutely no idea Lol. My plans stop at 100,000 feet, about where yours are just starting.

    Have been watching a few youtube rocket and balloon launches. It's amazing that even at 100k there's no air for sound to travel. Some of the hi-def video is impressive also.

  • #38
    Junior Member nathj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    somewhere over the rainbow
    Posts
    200
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    205
    Reputation
    36

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Learjet View Post
    Absolutely no idea Lol. My plans stop at 100,000 feet, about where yours are just starting.

    Have been watching a few youtube rocket and balloon launches. It's amazing that even at 100k there's no air for sound to travel. Some of the hi-def video is impressive also.

    iv ben running some simms and a J will make 280km height being launched from 100,000feet nice but thats a 70kg balloon!!

    amazing what rocks will do beyond the confindeds of air!!!

    the prob like i said b4 is braking away from that ballistic trajectory!!!!

    any thaughts lear from there???

    a l or an m rocket with side ways attitude??? ie u know the one!!!!!!!!!!

    lets get launched!!!

  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

    Similar Threads

    1. Optus Confirms D3 Launch
      By poiuytrewq in forum Satellite TV General
      Replies: 54
      Last Post: 25-08-09, 05:28 PM
    2. STS-119 Shuttle Discovery Launch
      By SatGuRu in forum General Chat
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: 13-03-09, 12:05 AM
    3. Nasa TV...rocket about to launch
      By viewer in forum General Chat
      Replies: 0
      Last Post: 06-02-09, 09:48 PM
    4. Computer virus goes into orbit
      By admin in forum General Chat
      Replies: 4
      Last Post: 28-08-08, 10:48 PM
    5. U.S. Spy Satellite Is Said to Be Falling From Orbit
      By SystemRat in forum General Science
      Replies: 16
      Last Post: 01-03-08, 01:29 PM

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •