Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Microsoft Security Essentials rated best free antivirus software

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    ssrattus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,160
    Thanks
    515
    Thanked 821 Times in 490 Posts
    Rep Power
    454
    Reputation
    5922

    Default Microsoft Security Essentials rated best free antivirus software

    from

    Microsoft Security Essentials rated best free antivirus software
    November 1, 2009
    by Dave Parrack

    Microsoft Security Essentials rated best free antivirus softwareWhen Microsoft announced Microsoft Security Essentials, its new free antivirus software designed to replace Windows Live OneCare, it was treated with contempt by the vendors of both other free antivirus software and the paid-for security suites. But a recent testing of the most popular antivirus products placed MSE on a par with the paid-for products and above its free competitors.

    A free antivirus product from Microsoft was touted for a year before it finally appeared. Originally codenamed Morro, MSE (Microsoft Security Essentials) was officially announced in June 2009. After a brief period of public beta testing, in which the product gained a resoundingly positive reception, it was finally released as a full product late September.

    A couple of weeks later came evidence that MSE had already proved its worth, with 2.6 million people having downloaded the product and it making four million infection detections in the first week. And it isn’t just users who are impressed with the software Microsoft is offering, with a new study into the effectiveness of several antivirus products rating MSE very highly.

    According to Ars Technica, AV-Comparatives tested 16 security products, both free and paid-for. The test focused on the malware removal/cleaning capabilities of the products rather than the detection and prevention capabilities.

    Antivirus Results

    The results, as seen above, were divided into ‘Removal of malware’ and ‘Removal of leftovers’, with the antivirus software then giving a rating based on their performance in the test.

    Symantec, eScan, and Microsoft Security Essentials were the only products to get Good ratings in both categories. And those three, along with F-Secure, Kaspersky, and Bitdefender were awarded Advanced+ ratings. ESET, Sophos, AVG, McAfee, Avast, AVIRA, and Trustport were rated Advanced; Norman, and G DATA were rated as Standard; Kingsoft was Tested.

    This is a great result for Microsoft because it puts MSE on a par with the best paid-for products and ahead of both paid-for and free alternatives.

    Microsoft Security Essentials is still not perfect but it’s clearly a solid product that will do as good or better a job at protecting your system as a host of other security suites. Meanwhile, the beta testing program continues, with new builds continually being sent out. So Microsoft is continually looking to improve the product to keep Windows-based PCs healthy and working.

    Maybe it is worth a try?

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ssrattus For This Useful Post:

    CrYpto (03-11-09),tristen (03-11-09),z1gg33 (06-11-09)



Look Here ->
  • #2
    Administrator
    admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Age
    56
    Posts
    31,150
    Thanks
    2,238
    Thanked 13,731 Times in 5,823 Posts
    Rep Power
    4552
    Reputation
    165805

    Default

    Very interesting. This will certainly put a dint in the profits of a few security companies if it takes off.

  • #3
    Administrator
    admin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Age
    56
    Posts
    31,150
    Thanks
    2,238
    Thanked 13,731 Times in 5,823 Posts
    Rep Power
    4552
    Reputation
    165805

    Default

    Just a note that it will validate your windows installation during install. I am using Vista Black and it passed. If your version doesnt , I dont know if you may start having issues with your probaly not legal version of windows.

  • #4
    Banned BlackDuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Where I live
    Posts
    1,719
    Thanks
    504
    Thanked 367 Times in 237 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    1146

    Default

    If your Windows is not "Valid" MSE won't install, It gives you the option to get a "Genuine" copy.

    As to any future problems any pirate user may have as a result of allowing Validation to take place...

    I'll let you know!.

  • #5
    Senior Member
    bigfella08's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,962
    Thanks
    1,791
    Thanked 771 Times in 340 Posts
    Rep Power
    333
    Reputation
    3732

    Default

    There was a review in the latest PC/USER December 09

    Antivirus Detection

    Microsoft Security Essentials 98.44%

    BitDefender 99.34%

    Norton 99.75%

    Adware/Spyware

    Microsoft Security Essentials 90.95%

    BitDefender 97.99%

    Norton 99.14%

    % = effectiveness

    For a free product probably a good install for those folk who love to pay the minimum for their Pc Then turn around and whinge because its no good because they were to tight to put an Antivirus package on

  • The Following User Says Thank You to bigfella08 For This Useful Post:


  • #6
    Premium Member rob916's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Bargara, Queensland.
    Age
    52
    Posts
    1,573
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked 75 Times in 36 Posts
    Rep Power
    250
    Reputation
    248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bigfella08 View Post
    There was a review in the latest PC/USER December 09
    Antivirus Detection
    Microsoft Security Essentials 98.44%
    BitDefender 99.34%
    Norton 99.75%
    Adware/Spyware
    Microsoft Security Essentials 90.95%
    BitDefender 97.99%
    Norton 99.14%
    % = effectiveness
    For a free product probably a good install for those folk who love to pay the minimum for their Pc Then turn around and whinge because its no good because they were to tight to put an Antivirus package on
    It really scares me when they rate Nortons 99%. I think the editor has free hookers and an around the world trip coming his way................
    Thanks for the info ssrattus
    Last edited by rob916; 05-11-09 at 05:43 PM.
    What happens if I press alt + F4?

  • 06-11-09, 10:24 PM

    Reason
    banned dribble

  • #7
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Location, Location
    Posts
    4,054
    Thanks
    1,170
    Thanked 930 Times in 532 Posts
    Rep Power
    418
    Reputation
    4290

    Default

    if nod ends up being a pain in the but (windows 7) i am going to try this.
    If you feed ducks at a pond, chances are your bound to feed a goose or two without even knowing it.

  • #8
    Senior Member gw1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    957
    Thanks
    49
    Thanked 608 Times in 213 Posts
    Rep Power
    267
    Reputation
    1901

    Default

    Microsoft Security Essentials is certainly better than nothing, and superior to some products out there. But if you look closely, the AV-Comparatives test only compared the cleanup effectiveness for a small sample of ten hand-picked non-destructive malwares. The test says nothing about malware detection rate, false positive rate or scanning speed.

    What's more, the Ars Technica writeup (cited by Vista.Blorge) recategorises the findings of AV-Comparatives in a way that makes Microsoft Security Essentials appear more elite than the original test report did: "Symantec, eScan, and Microsoft Security Essentials were the only products to get Good ratings in both categories." Though technically correct, that's just how they chose to slice and dice it. Here's the original test report summary:
    • Advanced+: eScan, Symantec, Microsoft, F-Secure, Kaspersky, Bitdefender
    • Advanced: ESET, Sophos, AVG, McAfee, Avast, AVIRA, Trustport
    • Standard: Norman, G DATA
    • Tested: Kingsoft
    Not quite so eye-catching is it? But when you're trying to get ad revenue from your website or blog it's no surprise you'll look for sexy angles like "free product is as good or better than any commercial one".

    For a more balanced judgement you need to also read reviews that test effectiveness against a much larger sample of malware, that analyse false positives, and other real-world considerations like speed and susceptibility to being crippled by preexisting infection. In those reviews the results for Microsoft are less glowing, eg which found MSE was quite good but not as fast as advertised, didn't clean up as thoroughly as the other review suggested, and was "dismal" with commercial keyloggers.

    Bottom line: MSE is only new but as free products go it's good. It's reasonably effective and integrates well, causing fewer problems with other applications than some AV products. If all you're using at present is a freebie (like AVG Free) then MSE is well worth trying. But watch that it doesn't mess with your auto-update settings: you don't want to get infected by Windows.Genuine!

    And remember the general rule: don't install more than one antivirus product at once. Otherwise, chances are, they'll fight and your PC will slow to a crawl. If changing AV products it's good practice to uninstall the first one, reboot, then install the new one.
    Last edited by gw1; 12-11-09 at 08:51 AM.

  • Similar Threads

    1. TOTALLY FREE - Internet Security
      By admin in forum Security and Privacy
      Replies: 6
      Last Post: 09-03-09, 03:16 PM
    2. Replies: 2
      Last Post: 23-02-09, 12:40 AM

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •