Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: looks like DMM are up to their old tricks again !.

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    206
    Reputation
    997

    Default looks like DMM are up to their old tricks again !.

    not happy with their recent legal action against satco the makers of the Vu receivers. now we have this.

    Code:
    http://www.reichholf.net/wp/2011/08/dear-pli-team-please-respect-the-license/
    personally i find the timing rather suspicious and to me it looks like another attempt by DMM to scupper the market for all other boxes but their own.

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to DUDE For This Useful Post:

    AJM (07-08-11),LeroyPatrol (07-08-11),marty 17 (07-08-11),tagg (07-08-11),weirdo (07-08-11)



Look Here ->
  • #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    206
    Reputation
    997

    Default

    ok this is now going a step further.

    Code:
    http://www.pli-images.org/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=48&thread_id=19254
    by the looks of it every image not running on a original dreambox must have the plugins this guy claims as his removed including amongst others the web interface.

    this is absolute crap but we must obey his wishes if he has the licenses as he states, the main thing i will personally miss and the one that will make the biggest difference is the web interface. now i'm not claiming to understand even a quarter of this but i do believe that this will end up leaving us the satellite communtiy in a stronger position as teams work together to make their own alternatives of his plugins and side step his demands legally.
    Last edited by DUDE; 07-08-11 at 08:48 AM. Reason: added more info

  • The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to DUDE For This Useful Post:

    AJM (07-08-11),best4less (07-08-11),LeroyPatrol (07-08-11),weirdo (07-08-11)

  • #3
    Senior Member
    LeroyPatrol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    N.E. Vic
    Posts
    16,229
    Thanks
    3,528
    Thanked 4,710 Times in 2,797 Posts
    Rep Power
    1670
    Reputation
    46551

    Default

    I don't really understand this guys point. I would feel honoured to have Pli use a plugin of mine and even happier if they improved on it. What's he trying to achieve? Oh yes he's a Dream Multimedia puppet. hehe

    He probably only wants a free Vu

    Leroy
    Last edited by LeroyPatrol; 07-08-11 at 04:14 PM.
    XCRUISER HDSR600HD twin sat and terrestrial receiver $OOS *
    XCRUISER HDSR385 Avant - sold out$OOS UltraPlus DVB-T and DVB-S2 tuners $49 Remotes $OOS

  • The Following User Says Thank You to LeroyPatrol For This Useful Post:

    Godzilla (08-08-11)

  • #4
    Senior Member
    irdeto2engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bletchley Park Code Breaking Labs
    Posts
    811
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
    Rep Power
    310
    Reputation
    4201

    Default

    Well the fact is that the Dreambox was designed to get around encryption systems and be used for satellite piracy, now some fella comes along and says you can't use his software. Pot calling kettle black wouldnt you say?

    Bah Humbug is what the Chinese clone makers will say. Chinese pirate just about everything they can and nobody sues them.

    Much ado about nothing.

    DM are overpriced and had many issues... so along come new STB's that are cheaper and better quality.

    Open source is just that...and everybody will take advantage of it.

  • The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to irdeto2engineer For This Useful Post:

    best4less (07-08-11),Godzilla (08-08-11),marty 17 (07-08-11),nando (07-08-11),weirdo (07-08-11)

  • #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    206
    Reputation
    997

    Default

    yeah but the Chinese cloners just clone the hardware they don't release images do they ?.

    i am not denying all the hard work put into the development of the enigma 2 system but tens of thousands of man hours and countless improvements have been made by these other teams, improvements that have greatly benefited dream as well. This latest action by dream and their puppets will hurt the hobby especially if the web interface is to be removed.

    all we can do for the moment is wait a few days and see how pli take things and go from there.

  • #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    206
    Reputation
    997

    Default

    As a example look towards the TM800, hardware wise this should have been a rite belter of a receiver but it has been drastically let down by seriously piss poor image support.

    This has both seriously damaged the receiver it self in terms of sales and future development and TM as a whole, now if this license nonsense goes far enough we could be left with a seriously neutered excuse for a image where all the major plugins such as the web interface go the same way as the soft-cams did.

    hopefully we get some talented guys who write their own versions of these affected plugins and get around this guys licenses that way. otherwise the satellite community as a whole is going to suffer badly as a result of his petty little demands.

  • #7
    Junior Member Zbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    245
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked 99 Times in 52 Posts
    Rep Power
    221
    Reputation
    730

    Default

    so a company decides to invest in hardware, take a risk, then others use that work and try to cash in, dmm started alot for people(and got screwed...but thats another story) the "hobbie" was destroyed years ago! alot of us just use the hardware to save on paying for extra boxes in our house. ffs this crap is the same as patent trolls, and anyone that says dmm products are over priced...pfft....out of the factory with a factory image they do what they are supposed to do, the ci slots allways work...thats the legal purpose, what happens afterwards is not thier problem. for those who remeber we all started with a "nokia".....i guess my point here is, enjoy because these days are now called the "gimmee generation"
    ive only been suspended once...but never banned...yet, but i am working on it...OMG after all these years...i am a paytv forum troll....erk
    ok i have, a phillips screwdriver, a sidchrome socket set, life time supply of condoms, lotsa old programers, an old nokia, season interface...even a pace 400....does this make me look better than DJmatt? oh i was also a "auspink" beta tester!...but apart from that i look great in suspenders

  • The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Zbee For This Useful Post:

    DUDE (07-08-11)

  • #8
    Junior Member Zbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    245
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked 99 Times in 52 Posts
    Rep Power
    221
    Reputation
    730

    Default

    oh forgot to mention "triple dragon" here, one of the original software guys devd stuff for the nokia, and was dangled a carrot to go in that direction...boy was that a mistake....must say still have my reelbox 1100 and it still works hehehehe
    ive only been suspended once...but never banned...yet, but i am working on it...OMG after all these years...i am a paytv forum troll....erk
    ok i have, a phillips screwdriver, a sidchrome socket set, life time supply of condoms, lotsa old programers, an old nokia, season interface...even a pace 400....does this make me look better than DJmatt? oh i was also a "auspink" beta tester!...but apart from that i look great in suspenders

  • #9
    Junior Member Zbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    245
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked 99 Times in 52 Posts
    Rep Power
    221
    Reputation
    730

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by irdeto2engineer View Post
    Well the fact is that the Dreambox was designed to get around encryption systems and be used for satellite piracy, now some fella comes along and says you can't use his software. Pot calling kettle black wouldnt you say?

    Bah Humbug is what the Chinese clone makers will say. Chinese pirate just about everything they can and nobody sues them.

    Much ado about nothing.

    DM are overpriced and had many issues... so along come new STB's that are cheaper and better quality.

    Open source is just that...and everybody will take advantage of it.
    naah caused enuf probs
    Last edited by Zbee; 07-08-11 at 08:50 PM.
    ive only been suspended once...but never banned...yet, but i am working on it...OMG after all these years...i am a paytv forum troll....erk
    ok i have, a phillips screwdriver, a sidchrome socket set, life time supply of condoms, lotsa old programers, an old nokia, season interface...even a pace 400....does this make me look better than DJmatt? oh i was also a "auspink" beta tester!...but apart from that i look great in suspenders

  • #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    206
    Reputation
    997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zbee View Post
    so a company decides to invest in hardware, take a risk, then others use that work and try to cash in, dmm started alot for people(and got screwed...but thats another story) the "hobbie" was destroyed years ago! alot of us just use the hardware to save on paying for extra boxes in our house. ffs this crap is the same as patent trolls, and anyone that says dmm products are over priced...pfft....out of the factory with a factory image they do what they are supposed to do, the ci slots allways work...thats the legal purpose, what happens afterwards is not thier problem. for those who remeber we all started with a "nokia".....i guess my point here is, enjoy because these days are now called the "gimmee generation"
    i dont disagree with you per say, i have been into this so called hobby for well over 23 years, personally i could give two figs about cardsharing that does not interest me one single bit. i do however value the ability to customize my receiver however i choose. if i wanted stock firmware i would stick with the service providers boxes. as for CI slots mine both work exactly as they should using a Vu+uno and the VIX image. same as my DM7020 using gemini.

  • The Following User Says Thank You to DUDE For This Useful Post:

    Zbee (07-08-11)

  • #11
    Junior Member Zbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    245
    Thanks
    58
    Thanked 99 Times in 52 Posts
    Rep Power
    221
    Reputation
    730

    Default

    to that i say...."grasshoper thanks master"
    ive only been suspended once...but never banned...yet, but i am working on it...OMG after all these years...i am a paytv forum troll....erk
    ok i have, a phillips screwdriver, a sidchrome socket set, life time supply of condoms, lotsa old programers, an old nokia, season interface...even a pace 400....does this make me look better than DJmatt? oh i was also a "auspink" beta tester!...but apart from that i look great in suspenders

  • #12
    Senior Member
    LeroyPatrol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    N.E. Vic
    Posts
    16,229
    Thanks
    3,528
    Thanked 4,710 Times in 2,797 Posts
    Rep Power
    1670
    Reputation
    46551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DUDE View Post
    i dont disagree with you per say, i have been into this so called hobby for well over 23 years, personally i could give two figs about cardsharing that does not interest me one single bit. i do however value the ability to customize my receiver however i choose. if i wanted stock firmware i would stick with the service providers boxes. as for CI slots mine both work exactly as they should using a Vu+uno and the VIX image. same as my DM7020 using gemini.
    This leads on to people being able to choose what receiver they want to use as well. The Austar provider box I have is a terrible quality composite output box with no PVR. So I choose to use a 3rd party receiver with PVR capability, HDMI bla bla bla.

    The DMM development/manufacturing model is similar to others where they develop receivers and sell them with 'factory' firmware that works with CI slots for example. But then there is some other development kinda on the side that develops emu's and plugins etc and though they say they don't have an interest in this, they do!

    Leroy
    XCRUISER HDSR600HD twin sat and terrestrial receiver $OOS *
    XCRUISER HDSR385 Avant - sold out$OOS UltraPlus DVB-T and DVB-S2 tuners $49 Remotes $OOS

  • #13
    Senior Member
    irdeto2engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bletchley Park Code Breaking Labs
    Posts
    811
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
    Rep Power
    310
    Reputation
    4201

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LeroyPatrol View Post
    The DMM development/manufacturing model is similar to others where they develop receivers and sell them with 'factory' firmware that works with CI slots for example. But then there is some other development kinda on the side that develops emu's and plugins etc and though they say they don't have an interest in this, they do!

    Leroy
    Exactly, these stb's would not sell if all they could do was put a card in the slot and not be used for CS around the house or around regions.

    How many of you would have bought DM's or other open source boxes if they could not be used to CS?

    I agree Leroy that being able to choose your own STB is a good thing. I have original sub cards in my STB as the provider allows this. But my boxes are not open source but they do have PVR and HDMI etc that the standard stb that you can get from the provider does not have.

    But DM's and Opensource made all content providers sit up and take a look at the serious losses these boxes caused them and take measures to ensure they new cards cannot be used, and if they can to make changes just as Foxtel has done.

  • #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    206
    Reputation
    997

    Default

    this latest post on the pli forum basically says it all

    Quote Originally Posted by reichi
    Quote Originally Posted by WanWizard
    None if this can attribute for your decision, unless all of a sudden (or maybe all along?) money has entered the equasion. And if that's the case, be a big boy, and admit it.
    You've obviously met the wrong people.
    I do know the guys (developers of e2) for a quite some time now. Well, even since before the DM7000S was available.
    And during development of my stuff they often did help me out. So they

    I never received a single cent vor anything I did.

    And by the way.
    Because of the way the other manufacturers act like, dream stopped adding new features for MONTHS now.
    So actually we, as dreambox community, do suffer from their damn ignorance (they basically forced Dream to act the way they do now).

    So it IS affecting MY dreambox.
    It IS freaking hurting MY hobby (i don't get any GREAT new stuff, except i build it myself).
    IT IS B******to say those guys behind VU+ and Co are "not guilty" about how the whole thing is fu**** up now.
    THEY caused the situation we're in now!
    If they decided to join the development of enigma2, our communities would have come together instead of drifting apart.

    THATS THE REASON, nothing else.

    It is soooo sad, really, we could have become an incredibly big community, across different products from different companies.
    Neither Dream nor the communities fu***d it up, it was the newcomers, and only them.
    And if you know the facts, you somehow cannot disagree on that.

    Ok, I will not explain myself any time again, cos it's starting to aggravate.
    I think I've made my points very very clear, several times. I think everything that has to be said has been said now.
    It's sad if you still don't believe me but I can't do any more than this to convince you...

    somehow you at least approched that i am really disappointed now, hope you're happy about that.

    PS: littlesat, you're a GREAT guy, with an exceptional character! Thank you for your words.

  • #15
    Senior Member Vic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    914
    Thanks
    68
    Thanked 267 Times in 154 Posts
    Rep Power
    255
    Reputation
    1304

    Default

    He is a moron enough said
    DM800 DM800se Vu+Duo ET9000

  • The Following User Says Thank You to Vic For This Useful Post:

    DUDE (08-08-11)

  • #16
    Senior Member
    irdeto2engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bletchley Park Code Breaking Labs
    Posts
    811
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
    Rep Power
    310
    Reputation
    4201

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vic View Post
    He is a moron enough said
    LATEST

    The Article is gone, and the discussion will be continued in private, which it should have been from the very beginning.

  • #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    206
    Reputation
    997

    Default

    its pretty much over and done with now. pli will be keeping the plugins however they will all have the TPM checks re-instated so that they will only run on original dreambox models. the author publicly stated that he detests boxes such as the CT/XT and Vu+'s and he does not want his plugins including the web interface, working on any thing but a original dreambox.
    Last edited by DUDE; 11-08-11 at 12:33 AM.

  • #18
    Senior Member
    LeroyPatrol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    N.E. Vic
    Posts
    16,229
    Thanks
    3,528
    Thanked 4,710 Times in 2,797 Posts
    Rep Power
    1670
    Reputation
    46551

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DUDE View Post
    its pretty much over and done with now. pli will be keeping the plugins however they will all have the TPH checks re-instated so that they will only run on original dreambox models. the author publicly stated that he detests boxes such as the CT/XT and Vu+'s and he does not want his plugins including the web interface, working on any thing but a original dreambox.
    Childish really.

    Leroy
    XCRUISER HDSR600HD twin sat and terrestrial receiver $OOS *
    XCRUISER HDSR385 Avant - sold out$OOS UltraPlus DVB-T and DVB-S2 tuners $49 Remotes $OOS

  • #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    267
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 189 Times in 97 Posts
    Rep Power
    206
    Reputation
    997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LeroyPatrol View Post
    Childish really.

    Leroy
    i could not agree more. at the end of the day this will hurt no one but dream multimedia.

  • The Following User Says Thank You to DUDE For This Useful Post:


  • #20
    Senior Member
    weirdo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    5,458
    Thanks
    4,638
    Thanked 3,135 Times in 1,633 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    29602

    Default

    Vic's right, he's a moron.
    How pathetic.

  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •