AJM (07-08-11),LeroyPatrol (07-08-11),marty 17 (07-08-11),tagg (07-08-11),weirdo (07-08-11)
not happy with their recent legal action against satco the makers of the Vu receivers. now we have this.
personally i find the timing rather suspicious and to me it looks like another attempt by DMM to scupper the market for all other boxes but their own.Code:http://www.reichholf.net/wp/2011/08/dear-pli-team-please-respect-the-license/
AJM (07-08-11),LeroyPatrol (07-08-11),marty 17 (07-08-11),tagg (07-08-11),weirdo (07-08-11)
Look Here -> |
ok this is now going a step further.
by the looks of it every image not running on a original dreambox must have the plugins this guy claims as his removed including amongst others the web interface.Code:http://www.pli-images.org/forum/viewthread.php?forum_id=48&thread_id=19254
this is absolute crap but we must obey his wishes if he has the licenses as he states, the main thing i will personally miss and the one that will make the biggest difference is the web interface. now i'm not claiming to understand even a quarter of this but i do believe that this will end up leaving us the satellite communtiy in a stronger position as teams work together to make their own alternatives of his plugins and side step his demands legally.
Last edited by DUDE; 07-08-11 at 08:48 AM. Reason: added more info
AJM (07-08-11),best4less (07-08-11),LeroyPatrol (07-08-11),weirdo (07-08-11)
I don't really understand this guys point. I would feel honoured to have Pli use a plugin of mine and even happier if they improved on it. What's he trying to achieve? Oh yes he's a Dream Multimedia puppet. hehe
He probably only wants a free Vu
Leroy
Last edited by LeroyPatrol; 07-08-11 at 04:14 PM.
XCRUISER HDSR600HD twin sat and terrestrial receiver $OOS *
XCRUISER HDSR385 Avant - sold out$OOS UltraPlus DVB-T and DVB-S2 tuners $49 Remotes $OOS
Godzilla (08-08-11)
Well the fact is that the Dreambox was designed to get around encryption systems and be used for satellite piracy, now some fella comes along and says you can't use his software. Pot calling kettle black wouldnt you say?
Bah Humbug is what the Chinese clone makers will say. Chinese pirate just about everything they can and nobody sues them.
Much ado about nothing.
DM are overpriced and had many issues... so along come new STB's that are cheaper and better quality.
Open source is just that...and everybody will take advantage of it.
yeah but the Chinese cloners just clone the hardware they don't release images do they ?.
i am not denying all the hard work put into the development of the enigma 2 system but tens of thousands of man hours and countless improvements have been made by these other teams, improvements that have greatly benefited dream as well. This latest action by dream and their puppets will hurt the hobby especially if the web interface is to be removed.
all we can do for the moment is wait a few days and see how pli take things and go from there.
As a example look towards the TM800, hardware wise this should have been a rite belter of a receiver but it has been drastically let down by seriously piss poor image support.
This has both seriously damaged the receiver it self in terms of sales and future development and TM as a whole, now if this license nonsense goes far enough we could be left with a seriously neutered excuse for a image where all the major plugins such as the web interface go the same way as the soft-cams did.
hopefully we get some talented guys who write their own versions of these affected plugins and get around this guys licenses that way. otherwise the satellite community as a whole is going to suffer badly as a result of his petty little demands.
so a company decides to invest in hardware, take a risk, then others use that work and try to cash in, dmm started alot for people(and got screwed...but thats another story) the "hobbie" was destroyed years ago! alot of us just use the hardware to save on paying for extra boxes in our house. ffs this crap is the same as patent trolls, and anyone that says dmm products are over priced...pfft....out of the factory with a factory image they do what they are supposed to do, the ci slots allways work...thats the legal purpose, what happens afterwards is not thier problem. for those who remeber we all started with a "nokia".....i guess my point here is, enjoy because these days are now called the "gimmee generation"
ive only been suspended once...but never banned...yet, but i am working on it...OMG after all these years...i am a paytv forum troll....erk
ok i have, a phillips screwdriver, a sidchrome socket set, life time supply of condoms, lotsa old programers, an old nokia, season interface...even a pace 400....does this make me look better than DJmatt? oh i was also a "auspink" beta tester!...but apart from that i look great in suspenders
DUDE (07-08-11)
oh forgot to mention "triple dragon" here, one of the original software guys devd stuff for the nokia, and was dangled a carrot to go in that direction...boy was that a mistake....must say still have my reelbox 1100 and it still works hehehehe
ive only been suspended once...but never banned...yet, but i am working on it...OMG after all these years...i am a paytv forum troll....erk
ok i have, a phillips screwdriver, a sidchrome socket set, life time supply of condoms, lotsa old programers, an old nokia, season interface...even a pace 400....does this make me look better than DJmatt? oh i was also a "auspink" beta tester!...but apart from that i look great in suspenders
Last edited by Zbee; 07-08-11 at 08:50 PM.
ive only been suspended once...but never banned...yet, but i am working on it...OMG after all these years...i am a paytv forum troll....erk
ok i have, a phillips screwdriver, a sidchrome socket set, life time supply of condoms, lotsa old programers, an old nokia, season interface...even a pace 400....does this make me look better than DJmatt? oh i was also a "auspink" beta tester!...but apart from that i look great in suspenders
i dont disagree with you per say, i have been into this so called hobby for well over 23 years, personally i could give two figs about cardsharing that does not interest me one single bit. i do however value the ability to customize my receiver however i choose. if i wanted stock firmware i would stick with the service providers boxes. as for CI slots mine both work exactly as they should using a Vu+uno and the VIX image. same as my DM7020 using gemini.
Zbee (07-08-11)
to that i say...."grasshoper thanks master"
ive only been suspended once...but never banned...yet, but i am working on it...OMG after all these years...i am a paytv forum troll....erk
ok i have, a phillips screwdriver, a sidchrome socket set, life time supply of condoms, lotsa old programers, an old nokia, season interface...even a pace 400....does this make me look better than DJmatt? oh i was also a "auspink" beta tester!...but apart from that i look great in suspenders
This leads on to people being able to choose what receiver they want to use as well. The Austar provider box I have is a terrible quality composite output box with no PVR. So I choose to use a 3rd party receiver with PVR capability, HDMI bla bla bla.
The DMM development/manufacturing model is similar to others where they develop receivers and sell them with 'factory' firmware that works with CI slots for example. But then there is some other development kinda on the side that develops emu's and plugins etc and though they say they don't have an interest in this, they do!
Leroy
XCRUISER HDSR600HD twin sat and terrestrial receiver $OOS *
XCRUISER HDSR385 Avant - sold out$OOS UltraPlus DVB-T and DVB-S2 tuners $49 Remotes $OOS
Exactly, these stb's would not sell if all they could do was put a card in the slot and not be used for CS around the house or around regions.
How many of you would have bought DM's or other open source boxes if they could not be used to CS?
I agree Leroy that being able to choose your own STB is a good thing. I have original sub cards in my STB as the provider allows this. But my boxes are not open source but they do have PVR and HDMI etc that the standard stb that you can get from the provider does not have.
But DM's and Opensource made all content providers sit up and take a look at the serious losses these boxes caused them and take measures to ensure they new cards cannot be used, and if they can to make changes just as Foxtel has done.
this latest post on the pli forum basically says it all
Originally Posted by reichi
He is a moron enough said
DM800 DM800se Vu+Duo ET9000
DUDE (08-08-11)
its pretty much over and done with now. pli will be keeping the plugins however they will all have the TPM checks re-instated so that they will only run on original dreambox models. the author publicly stated that he detests boxes such as the CT/XT and Vu+'s and he does not want his plugins including the web interface, working on any thing but a original dreambox.
Last edited by DUDE; 11-08-11 at 12:33 AM.
Vic's right, he's a moron.
How pathetic.
Bookmarks