Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: IP Cameras and Macintosh

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    downunderdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney Metropolitan
    Posts
    2,497
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 601 Times in 422 Posts
    Rep Power
    366
    Reputation
    4649

    Default IP Cameras and Macintosh

    Has anyone had any success with IP Cameras and/or DVRs that perform well when viewed via a Mac-based web browser?

    Most of the Asian manufactured gear relies on ActiveX controls which requires Internet Explorer under Windows.



Look Here ->
  • #2
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,106
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 839 Times in 515 Posts
    Rep Power
    369
    Reputation
    6489

    Default

    I think AVTECH DVRs work with Safari & Hikvision are working on it. As for IP cameras, I'm not sure.

  • #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    124
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 30 Times in 17 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    143

    Default

    you will find that the AVTECH units can be viewed through Firefox on the Mac.

  • #4
    Senior Member
    downunderdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney Metropolitan
    Posts
    2,497
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 601 Times in 422 Posts
    Rep Power
    366
    Reputation
    4649

    Default

    Is it fully functional? Or a dumbed down interface or straight video stream.

    A lot of cameras and DVRs can supply a stream via motion JPEG or RTSP, but you'd still need a copy of Windows lying around to get to the good stuff...

    I visited AVTECH's website and there wasn't much hard data but some online reviews seem positive. Their site notes "The best way to browse this site is by IE 6.0" D'oh! Haven't seen messages like that since the Great Browser Wars. Anyone had any hard experience with them? Their camera specs aren't great, but their DVR could be an interim solution. Online demo of the DVR isn't working...
    Last edited by downunderdan; 22-09-11 at 10:41 AM.

  • #5
    Senior Member
    intelliGEORGE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, AUSTRALIA
    Age
    43
    Posts
    4,106
    Thanks
    884
    Thanked 1,484 Times in 691 Posts
    Rep Power
    479
    Reputation
    7236

    Default

    Dan,

    You'll need to find some manufacturers that support Java instead of ActiveX. Also, if you wait a little longer, chances are manufacturers will start embracing HTML5 which will do away with plug-ins.




  • #6
    Senior Member
    downunderdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney Metropolitan
    Posts
    2,497
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 601 Times in 422 Posts
    Rep Power
    366
    Reputation
    4649

    Default

    Thanks George. The opposite argument is that they have a lot invested in their old stock and don't want to do away with it.

    As far as I'm concerned, ActiveX should have died years ago, but it still festers.

  • #7
    Junior Member MegapixelMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Gods Country - Australia
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Rep Power
    161
    Reputation
    38

    Default

    I would look at EXACQ

    I have used these with MAC's and they work fine.... You just need to make the adjustments via the camera first on a windows PC and then you can make the Frame, Compression final adjustments in the Exacq Software.. Easy to use and better then the chinese junk.

    You can get this from Video Security Products !! Ask for Dan in the QLD office...

    0755 975708

  • #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    NE Vic
    Age
    38
    Posts
    304
    Thanks
    27
    Thanked 27 Times in 23 Posts
    Rep Power
    180
    Reputation
    160

    Default

    NUUO will also do it, but cheaper than Exacq.
    Exacq is aimed at your middle to high range systems - its a good product but its the truth. Dan will say the same thing.

    NUUO is for your smaller clients.

    NUUO has a Mac specific version too? pretty sure....

  • #9
    Senior Member
    downunderdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney Metropolitan
    Posts
    2,497
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 601 Times in 422 Posts
    Rep Power
    366
    Reputation
    4649

    Default

    According to the NUUO , Mac is not supported.

  • #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    NE Vic
    Age
    38
    Posts
    304
    Thanks
    27
    Thanked 27 Times in 23 Posts
    Rep Power
    180
    Reputation
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by downunderdan View Post
    According to the NUUO , Mac is not supported.
    then its in development, had mac running at tradeshow on Q Video stand

  • #11
    Senior Member
    downunderdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney Metropolitan
    Posts
    2,497
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 601 Times in 422 Posts
    Rep Power
    366
    Reputation
    4649

    Default

    Then it's probably academic until they release it for mainstream. However are you sure you saw a Mac native bit of software? Or could it have been a Mac emulating Windows, which is often better than a Windows laptop due to the ability to take 'snapshots'.

  • #12
    Junior Member MegapixelMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Gods Country - Australia
    Posts
    42
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
    Rep Power
    161
    Reputation
    38

    Default

    Yeah Exacq cater for all budgets as they have the Start Software and Professional Version... The Exacq Start is about $40 or $50 per camera with no added software, so 8cameras for the entire package is about $320-$400..Not bad I think

    MM

  • #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    NE Vic
    Age
    38
    Posts
    304
    Thanks
    27
    Thanked 27 Times in 23 Posts
    Rep Power
    180
    Reputation
    160

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by downunderdan View Post
    Then it's probably academic until they release it for mainstream. However are you sure you saw a Mac native bit of software? Or could it have been a Mac emulating Windows, which is often better than a Windows laptop due to the ability to take 'snapshots'.
    couldnt answer this straight for you

  • Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •