hmm.. depends..
for tah money a lil extra will get you into the HD realm, which is somethign i'd recomend.
The recording format will be deteremined by whether or not you wan to edit your stuff... for tape based HD material, its HDV, which is probably the most common.. with this canons HV20 is a great option. Prolly one of the better options in fact.
Sony have some smaler units which are tape based and use the HDV mpg2 format. Not bad IMO, and prolly the easist HD format to edit with.
For straight shooting and playback, teh JVC and the new everios are pretty decent efforts. They use a proprietary format though, so be aware that editing may nto be posible unless its converted.
Panasonic.. now this is the interesting one...
AVCHD... AVCHD is the new improved HD codec which has been touted as being the future of HD acquisition and delivery.
IMO, theyre right, as AVC Intra (Professional version) does not have long gop issues such as motion or compression artefacts. There is also teh issue of tape based units and incessant dropouts which have the potential to lose critical material. As the Pana units (and the upcoming Canon units) are recording to solid state or flash memory, the issue of tape based acquisition will no longer be an issue.
No dropouts, no cpaturing,.. jsut direct to flash/SD/CF card recordng then transfer to PC for edit.
Now AVC however doesnt use as high a bitrate as HDV, but it doesnt need to and this is the beauty of the format. Its cleaner, richer in colour, less compressed (seemingly to the human eye) and does not have motion artefact issues.
If i was in yoru hoes at this point in time, I would check out teh AVCHD offerings from P, BUT i wouldnt buy anyhing till i checked out out the new canon units which use Flash and CF memory
Bookmarks