Differing pinouts could explain it and comparing the connections of 2797 and 760 would confirm or debunk that theory easily, but I do suspect that Garmin may be playing it smart. The 'standard' [non a/v socket] mounts for the nuvi 2797 and unit-only dezl 760 [the only two versions in this unit family not supplied with the BC 20 in the box] seem to be the same one. To make the dezl 760 work with the BC 20 you simply change the standard mount to the a/v capable mount supplied with the BC 20. Logically, it would seem that the 2797 would be the same, and maybe it is, but Garmin don't wish to publicise that for some reason. It wouldn't be the first time they and others have disguised product capabilities for some reason. In this case maybe to discourage ppl from buying the cheaper 2797 and coupling it with the BC 20 rather than buying the more expensive dezl 760. Even more reason to do that when they know ppl are buying 2797s to convert them to dezl anyway. Disinformation by omission is rife when it suits marketing purposes.
Here's some more info that I've found digging around, some of which is a little confusing to me:
The BC 20 is mentioned everywhere to be 'wireless', but is also supplied with an a/v cable which I assume is to be used if the wireless signal isn't reliable. These' also a 50 foot [15m] extension cable option available for longer vehicles. Now to me 'wireless' in isolation means 2.4G/5G/DECT including the much older 900MHz and 1200MHz bands type of technology as used for cordless phones and wi-fi devices. If you're talking the similar radio technology but much [usually] less powerful Bluetooth it's usually named as such i.e. 'Bluetooth Wireless', or simply 'Bluetooth' or in common abbreviation "BT'. However, I've come across a reference to the BC 20 as a Bluetooth device in a Q & A from GPSCity [who's info is usually reliable]:
Code:
http://www.gpscity.com/questions?qid=36312
'Roxie' from there says, inter alia: "
4. The options for connecting the camera to the GPS are either hardwire or Bluetooth pairing, up to 45 feet.". I think some types of BT configurations have no problem with that range, and it some cases range can be around or even exceed 100m/330ft.
They also regard the 2797 as not BC 20-capable, although 'Tom' may simply be relying on the same info I've gleaned from Garmin to give this answer:
Code:
http://www.gpscity.com/questions?qid=40872
If 'Roxie' is to be trusted, a reasonable deduction is that the camera could be paired with any BT capable device with is also capable of displaying video, e.g. a nuvi 2797, and in that case there should be no need to have the a/v socket mount which is perhaps simply a means to feed the a/v to the unit if the BT signal is unreliable BUT it would also mean that the camera cannot be powered constantly when the vehicle is keyed on, it must be connected to the reversing lights, power up on selecting reverse and establish a BT connection each time with the unit or otherwise the unit's screen would constantly show the back-up signal overriding the navigation display. That method [even if it would work] sounds quite clunky and may take several seconds or more even if pairing is set to auto connect each time. It would also mean of course that a phone cannot be simultaneously paired with the unit as well.
I don't claim to be an expert is these fields at all, so you need to satisfy yourself otherwise. You could contact Garmin if you haven't completely thrown in the towel yet and ask them what wireless communication method is actually used by the BC 20. i.e. Is it BT or a Wi-Fi-type wireless. That'll be like trying to drawn blood from a stone I'd think, so good luck with that.
A sneaky way would be to find a retailer with a 'no questions asked money back policy', buy a 2797 and BC 20 and do some experimenting yourself. Justify it to yourself mentally and blame Garmin for turning you into a sneak if [i.e. when] you can't get precise answers from them.
Another interesting little gem of confusion is that there are two nuvi 2798 models. The US/AU 2797 and the US 2798 share HWID 1517 and use the same firmware. But there's also a European model 3798 which is just a 2797 packaged with a digital HD traffic receiver instead of the FM receiver included with the EU 2797. The EU 2798 doesn't come with BC 20 or have it listed as an accessory either, the 8 substituted for the 7 simply indicating it comes with the HD traffic model. And now I've found a 2798 specific firmware for HWID 1884 of which I've not been aware of before. I assume its for the EU 2798. All the firmwares share PCB P/Ns so if that's EU specific fw, even the EU 2798 is cross flashable to the US nuvi fw, as well as the already known possibilities to convert either of *7 or *8 nuvi>dezl>RV and vice versa. Interesting what you find out by accident sometimes.
Bookmarks