View Poll Results: Enable it or Leave it disabled

Voters
2. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    1 50.00%
  • No

    1 50.00%
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Bosch 880 Telephone Line Fault Option

  1. #1
    Junior Member tready's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    32
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    160
    Reputation
    90

    Question Bosch 880 Telephone Line Fault Option

    Hi Austech crew,

    Just wondering how the phone line monitors works and if it's recommended to turn on. I like the idea of having but my installer doesn't.

    The reason i want it as i use voip for my main line, and have second pstn for the foxtel and alarm system and sometimes the fax, I have no real idea if something is up with the line other then the weekly test reporting. So what are your guys opinions. I have the installer code and can turn it on (Have already tested it and know how it functions)

    Thanks



Look Here ->
  • #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    370
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 46 Times in 42 Posts
    Rep Power
    221
    Reputation
    596

    Default

    turn it on but make sure the system is programmed to generate a fault condition at the code pad and not to trigger the sirens. I think this panel is checking the line voltage for the fault condition which is not the best way but it is better than nothing.

  • The Following User Says Thank You to kiwitech For This Useful Post:

    tready (14-06-14)

  • #3
    Member AdRock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    330
    Thanks
    167
    Thanked 45 Times in 43 Posts
    Rep Power
    175
    Reputation
    450

    Default

    Phone line monitoring is always after the fact (unless you have GPRS backup) It can't report anything to the control room if the phone line doesn't work.

    As Kiwitech mentioned, you'd need it to produce a fault on the keypad for it to be of any benefit.

  • The Following User Says Thank You to AdRock For This Useful Post:

    tready (14-06-14)

  • #4
    Junior Member tready's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    32
    Thanks
    13
    Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
    Rep Power
    160
    Reputation
    90

    Default

    thanks to those who helped.
    If anyone else has some more info on how it actually works would be great to know
    Last edited by tready; 14-06-14 at 09:10 PM.

  • #5
    Senior Member
    downunderdan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Sydney Metropolitan
    Posts
    2,497
    Thanks
    163
    Thanked 601 Times in 422 Posts
    Rep Power
    365
    Reputation
    4649

    Default

    Tready, it's very basic in operation. The alarm panel is looking for voltage (think dialtone) on the line. The absence of this indicates to the panel that the phoneline might have been removed from the panel (telco outage, line unplugged, line cut etc.)

    In such a case, depending on its programming the alarm panel can do a number of things including triggering the sirens (not really a good idea in most cases) or displaying a fault message.

    What it cannot do, of course is ring a monitoring centre via the phoneline to say there's a problem, as..... The phoneline has been cut.

    Generally speaking your monitoring centre is expecting to receive at least one signal on a regular basis e.g. once every 7 days (168hrs) at a minimum. The failure to receive one will trigger a message in their software saying your system might have a problem.

    This is why phoneline 'dialler' monitoring is considered low-security. If the line is cut, no signals can reported and you might only be aware of a problem days afterward (having been cleared out by crooks). More modern technologies such as 'IP Monitoring' allow for a more regular 'heartbeat'. So whereas your system is 'polled' once every 7 days, this could be reduced to once an hour, once every few minutes or even seconds. Moreover such systems generally do not rely on a phoneline to begin with so cutting it is of negligible impact.

    Does that explain it?
    Last edited by downunderdan; 15-06-14 at 11:20 AM.

  • The Following User Says Thank You to downunderdan For This Useful Post:

    tready (25-11-14)

  • Tags for this Thread

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •