Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 46

Thread: Earths Hidden Twin

  1. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Super Duper Secret Members Forum
    Posts
    374
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    21

    Default

    If you adjust your telescope correctly you can see a great big EYE out in space staring back at you.

    Holy shit!!!

    Refraction & Diffraction can make some funky things appear in places they shouldn't be.



  • #22
    Senior Member osci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,998
    Thanks
    579
    Thanked 340 Times in 170 Posts
    Rep Power
    295
    Reputation
    1560

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by intelliGEORGE View Post
    Google has a car that captures 360 degree 20Mpixel images, yet somehow NASA will only have 1 camera on the space probe. I don't think so. I'd think if I was spending millions to send up a space probe, I'd be putting more than 1 camera on it.
    so why then haven't the mars probes on their way to mars not taken any photo's during transit between the two planets (earth to mars), is it because they wouldn't take the photo's or they couldn't take photo's?

    we've all seen plenty of pix taken once the probes (the surveyors and landers) have reached their pre-determined destinations whether in orbit around or on the surface of mars.

    I'm aware of only one camera on board the mars landers and this would be neatly tucked away during transit phase until its reached the destination, this way the camera couldn't be damaged during transit by particles in space, and further to this the logistics needs to be given carefull consideration as well, if there are to be more than one camera, such as extra weight for payload purposes, extra space required in the probe to house the extra equipment, you have to keep in mind that space agencies keep their payloads to an absolute minimum and thats because of the considerable resources that are required just to get the payloads out of earths gravity in the first instance!!

    But its ok for the Google car which captures 360degree photos of 20mega pixels that doesn't have these constraints with leaving the earths gravity to contend with does it......
    Democracy & Ignorance = A Winning Combination

  • #23
    Senior Member osci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,998
    Thanks
    579
    Thanked 340 Times in 170 Posts
    Rep Power
    295
    Reputation
    1560

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by biggeorge View Post
    If you adjust your telescope correctly you can see a great big EYE out in space staring back at you.

    Holy shit!!!

    Refraction & Diffraction can make some funky things appear in places they shouldn't be.
    so are you saying that all of these astronomers both professional & amateur, who recorded seeing something they could not easily explain

    Gian Domenico Cassini - 1662
    James Short - 1740
    Andraes Mayer - 1759
    Joseph-Louise Lagrange -1761
    Jacques Montainge -1761
    Redner of Coppenhagen - 1761
    Roedkier - 1764
    Christian Horrebow - 1768
    Edward Emerson Barnard -1892

    were seeing was refraction & diffraction, these funky things in places where they shouldn't be
    Democracy & Ignorance = A Winning Combination

  • #24
    Senior Member
    trash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tamworth
    Posts
    4,088
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 3,229 Times in 1,451 Posts
    Rep Power
    1287
    Reputation
    47674

    Default

    And you're saying they were infallible ?

    Everybody makes mistakes, but even smart people are sometimes not smart enough to see it, or admit to it, and then there are those who continue to believe the error even after it has long since been corrected.

    There is also the chance that something has been overlooked. But the onus is on evidence being supplied, not because speculation can be so easily generated.

  • #25
    Senior Member osci's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,998
    Thanks
    579
    Thanked 340 Times in 170 Posts
    Rep Power
    295
    Reputation
    1560

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by trash View Post
    And you're saying they were infallible ?

    Everybody makes mistakes, but even smart people are sometimes not smart enough to see it, or admit to it, and then there are those who continue to believe the error even after it has long since been corrected.

    There is also the chance that something has been overlooked. But the onus is on evidence being supplied, not because speculation can be so easily generated.
    There's been no suggestion these guys are infallible or fallible.........

    but it is amazing how readily prepared mainstream are to reject a notion that an enigma (if I can call it that) may possibly exist that doesn't or won't fit into mainstreams conpartments or will not fit mainstreams view of history or how these enigmas cannot be satisfactorily explained or goes against the grain of what academia tries to us.
    Democracy & Ignorance = A Winning Combination

  • #26
    Senior Member
    trash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tamworth
    Posts
    4,088
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 3,229 Times in 1,451 Posts
    Rep Power
    1287
    Reputation
    47674

    Default

    It's easily rejected not because everybody is light headed, it's easily rejected because there was never any substance presented in the first place.

    Ludicrous theories are even more quickly dispatched than weak theories which require at least some thought to debunk.

    If you present a well thought out case to the forum, you may find that most of us will respond with the full use of our brains rather than the little bit at the base of which we use for debunking (The Amygdala Oblongata).

    You asked; "Is this beyond the bounds of the probable?"
    The answer was No. (no, it is not probable and in this solar system it's not even possible.)

    Did you want us to tell you the truth or just the answer you wanted to hear ?

    Science is all about discovering new things, I know you've learnt at least two things from it. Earth's pseudo second moon and resonant orbits.

    Lets see if we can learn some more stuff.

    I can also think of two points in space relative to the Earth's position and orbit which are gravitational wells where asteroids could become trapped.
    Unfortunately, both are within line of sight of the Earth and anything as big as a planet would not only be very obvious, but would also gravitationally destablise the very existance of such a well.

    If you like the idea of all these strange places in space or the existance of hidden planets and moons, might I suggest that you download one of the many gravitiational simulators and attempt to generate a stable solar system that has the nine known planets in the current configuration and then add in an extra planet in Earth orbit 180 degrees out of phase.

    Hell there are some fun things you can do with gravity simulators. My favourite was creating a planet with a square orbit !

  • #27
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Wycheproof
    Posts
    8
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    10

    Default

    Hi every1,

    The whole Planet X thing relied on unexplained purturbations in Neptune's orbit. Last I heard we were still finding REALLY big objects in Kuiper Belt. There are probably millions of these large objects out there *shrug*.

    On an entirely different topic...calculating ANY object's orbit is problematic since it involves solving a many-body problem...and as such can only be *reliable* with multiple observations over long periods of time and even then they are stochastic...

    Cheers,

    CZ.

  • #28
    Senior Member
    trash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tamworth
    Posts
    4,088
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 3,229 Times in 1,451 Posts
    Rep Power
    1287
    Reputation
    47674

    Default

    I can't even spell stochastic let alone pronouce it !

    Sounds like you might want to sell us some stocks or futures shares in undiscovered planetoids ?

  • #29
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Age
    39
    Posts
    1
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    10

    Default

    Very interesting thread. But I think its only a myth. If there was something we would have seen it.

  • #30
    Senior Member
    Learjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Queensland
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,454
    Thanks
    650
    Thanked 1,203 Times in 391 Posts
    Rep Power
    564
    Reputation
    15945

    Default

    This isn't like that Nibiru BS from Zachariah Sitchin is it?

  • #31
    Senior Member
    trash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Tamworth
    Posts
    4,088
    Thanks
    148
    Thanked 3,229 Times in 1,451 Posts
    Rep Power
    1287
    Reputation
    47674

    Default

    Beats me, but anybody with a name like Zachariah Sitchin obviously has "issues".

  • #32
    Senior Member
    Learjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Queensland
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,454
    Thanks
    650
    Thanked 1,203 Times in 391 Posts
    Rep Power
    564
    Reputation
    15945

    Default

    Sitchin is the not very bright fellow that predicts an encounter with the non existent planet Nibiru in 2012 predicting the end of the world etc. You know, the usual conspiracy theory sort of thing.

  • #33
    Junior Member Artilect's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Age
    46
    Posts
    28
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    190
    Reputation
    10

    Default Evidence

    If this Hidden twin earth exists?
    I want to know where is the evidence, as trash has stated, the gravatational turbulence of a second planet in earth orbit would cause Mars' orbit to be non eliptical. which means that the Mars Rover would have missed the planet by a million miles.

    osci are you seriously suggesting that I believe that the possibility exists, without any confirmable empirical evidence. Mate your dreaming. I think you should keep reading SciFi and leave reality alone.
    Sextus Empiricus advises that we should suspend judgment about virtually all beliefs, that is, we should neither affirm any belief as true nor deny any belief as false.

    Pyrrho stated that "nothing is in itself true or false. It only appears so. In the same way, nothing is in itself good or evil. It is only opinion, custom, law, which makes it so."

  • #34
    Senior Member
    Learjet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Queensland
    Age
    61
    Posts
    1,454
    Thanks
    650
    Thanked 1,203 Times in 391 Posts
    Rep Power
    564
    Reputation
    15945

    Default

    In this day and age with our present technology, any Earth size planet in the solar system would have been detected. There's nowhere for it to hide.

  • #35
    Senior Member osiris777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    In Dreams
    Posts
    897
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 159 Times in 85 Posts
    Rep Power
    246
    Reputation
    973

    Default

    i have investigated this phenomenon and can undoubtably confirm that there is indeed an Earth twin orbiting our sun.
    topic closed.
    ...In Somnis Veritas...

  • #36
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,545
    Thanks
    1,420
    Thanked 530 Times in 290 Posts
    Rep Power
    374
    Reputation
    4678

    Default

    interesting stuff guys. isnt an asterroid coming very close to us in 2029 ?

  • #37
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Super Duper Secret Members Forum
    Posts
    374
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation
    21

    Default

    Yes, but by that time they will have the phase cannons installed on the International Space Station and between the two earths we'll be able to blast the sucker out of the way, whichever one it decides to try and annihilate.

  • #38
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,545
    Thanks
    1,420
    Thanked 530 Times in 290 Posts
    Rep Power
    374
    Reputation
    4678

    Default

    ill be still alive in 2029 as long as i dont get cancer or nothing, will you be biggeorge ?

  • #39
    Senior Member osiris777's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    In Dreams
    Posts
    897
    Thanks
    14
    Thanked 159 Times in 85 Posts
    Rep Power
    246
    Reputation
    973

    Default

    i wouldnt worry too much folks, remember we have Bruce Willis on hand.
    ...In Somnis Veritas...

  • #40
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    2,545
    Thanks
    1,420
    Thanked 530 Times in 290 Posts
    Rep Power
    374
    Reputation
    4678

    Default

    hahha i fkn love that movie

  • Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

    Bookmarks

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •