why are you going to use krone block to join your alarm cabling.
Hello, this is my first post (of many more I hope). I have been lurking long enough.
My question is probably a common one, but can I use Cat5 for alarm cabling to PIR's etc. Now, I know that there is an AS for the cable. I will be running all my cables into Krone blocks and I am slightly concerned that the cross-sectional area of the alarm cable will be too thick to punch down into the Krone blocks.
This is for my own home, so I am wiring this home up "to the max".
*edit - I am placing a PIR in every room, and will use a DAS NX system with (hopefully) a SMS module and no back-to-base monitoring (which, incidently, I believe is a big con and waster of money).
Look Here -> |
why are you going to use krone block to join your alarm cabling.
Hi chimp, because I have Krone blocks setup on frames for my phone, network, balanced audio to 5 rooms, and other data, so I may as well make it all look the same.
Actually, I have just punched down some Garland 4-core MC14 security cable and it works fine.
Is there a common convention for the color code for alarm cable? Red Black Blue White? Which order is preferred?
Did this once and once only a long long time ago
Cat5 doesn't like screw terminals it fractures at termination popint
Go straight to the panel one less fault point
If your going to do it up to the max then do it properly.
Being x telstra, I also did this many years ago & wired the alarm as per exchange wiring principles. IDF & tie cables. I found out that it is not the BEST way. Run cables directly from the devices to the panel with no joins. It can be run in cat 5 & it will work but it is NOT the BEST way to do it.
RED - +ve
BLACK - -ve
Blue & white (or yell & green ) device contacts
Codepad I always use white(yellow) for data & Blue (green) for clock. External siren/strob I use red/black for strobe & blue/white for siren. With Bosch systems the tamper can be wired with the same 4 core you use for the siren/strobe.
Hi ,
FWIW, wiring for security to AusStandards is with the use of multistranded cabling not less than 7 strand x 0.20mm sq Double Insulated i.e. not CAT5
Also Krone blocks are not suitable as any join should be soldered or screw terminal and not both.
There are reasons but its the standard/law so ...
rgds
MCMan
Cat 5 prolly doesn't have the cross sectional area needed to run some things.
Plus as mentioned already, Cat 5 is made to be terminated a certain way, doing it any other way is just asking for breaks.
You might think you are saving money..... But at the end of the day when things go wrong, are you?
Back to base is not a "con" / "wate of money" but it is your call. SMS is a very baisc way to monitor your alarm system, you are far better off with a back to base system, with a decent monitoring centre.
I wold much rater a human call me, advising me of what zones are in alarm, how many times, which battery is low, and heaven forbid i hit a duress alarm. Poilce are sent, rather then a "sms" to myself. (keep in mind sms does not have a guaranteed uptime, they can / are / will be delayed"
[quote=bradj;76908]Hello, this is my first post (of many more I hope). I have been lurking long enough.
My question is probably a common one, but can I use Cat5 for alarm cabling to PIR's etc. Now, I know that there is an AS for the cable. I will be running all my cables into Krone blocks and I am slightly concerned that the cross-sectional area of the alarm cable will be too thick to punch down into the Krone blocks.
This is for my own home, so I am wiring this home up "to the max".
*edit - I am placing a PIR in every room, and will use a DAS NX system with (hopefully) a SMS module and no back-to-base monitoring (which, incidently, I believe is a big con and waster of money).[/quote]
Let me say this. A criminal decides you are the target for his next home invasion. He breaks in and threatens your family and you hit the panic button even if it is only on your keypad or maybe just the back door goes in alarm while you are in bed asleep. The balaclava clad crooks force you to disarm your system. With by the way works as you intended and sends you an SMS. Do you think the the home invaders will allows you to read your sms so you can call the cops. Maybe they will think the cops were called when they see the message and decide rip your head off in a panic. Monitoring is not a rip off or a con and it is certainly not a wast of $$.
Did not mean to sort of repeat a post ... Just read what Keefy said after I submitted. So we are thinking along the same lines.
Well, to sum up , thanks for all the advice.
I know first hand that most major Victorian monitoring companies DO NOT send out a patrol and always call police for simple activations like "wrong keypad combinations" - they actually call Triple-0. This a complete waste of police resources and they should be sending their own patrols, AS THE PROMISE in their sales pitch to the customer.
My purpose for SMS is to inform my directly when I am out and then I will return to conduct a check on the home.
If I am home and someone breaks in - so be it. I will look after myself. I don't need to pay for monitoring to have a dumb arse in a monitoring centre pick the phone up and call Triple-0.
Sydneytech, you write quite well, but like many in the security industry, the phrases "home invasion" and "you will be the next target" should be reserved for TV morning advertorials. This industry feeds off fear that "you will be next".... "you will be murdered in your own home, your wife and kids will be shot, your dog will be raped..." And it doesnt take a genius to install one, although many think you need "special" qualifications to do so.
Funny that banks, commercial premises and other places dont have sms moudles, nor do they call montoring quote "which, incidently, I believe is a big con and waster of money).
Guys if he doesnt want back to base monitoring he doesnt have to have it and is quite entitled to say he thinks its a con/waste of money. He is entitled to his opinion.
If I got an alarm , I also wouldnt have it monitored apart from SMS to myself. Its an individual choice based on personal circumstances , probably much like the original poster. The only difference between him and me is he appears to know something about alarms.
Can we skip back to about post 8 and continue from there ?
Must be hard of hearing. Do you want me to say it again ?
Last edited by admin; 14-08-08 at 06:42 PM. Reason: The obvious
.
Last edited by admin; 14-08-08 at 06:43 PM. Reason: remove quote/off topic
.
Last edited by admin; 14-08-08 at 06:44 PM. Reason: remove quote/off topic
Bookmarks